Stow-A-Way Plasma Cutter Table
10 Sep 2021 14:09 #220133
by joeslide
Stow-A-Way Plasma Cutter Table was created by joeslide
I want to be able to stow 4’ by 8’ sheets of steel away underneath my welding table (which of course will be slightly larger than the sheets of steel). The sheets will be stacked on a custom-made low profile trailer that will be parked underneath the welding table. I’ll use this trailer when I go buy the steel (⅜ inch 4’x8’ sheet weighs about around 500 lbs). After parking the trailer underneath the welding table, I want to pull out a selected sheet and cut it with my plasma table that is stored just above the trailer. So I need a frame with linear rails (2 axis) to support the plasma torch and cut out the selected dimensions (all straight cuts for now). I’m thinking of using steel tubes to support the rails. I would like to use a Jog Pendant to control the cutting (for now).Questions
- What length of linear rails do I need for 4’x8’ sheets?
- What length of T8 lead screws do I need?
- Suggestions on torque motors? 17 or 23? Torque Spec?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19106
- Thank you received: 6398
10 Sep 2021 17:02 #220144
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Stow-A-Way Plasma Cutter Table
1. Minimum of 10% more than the required travel, 15% are nice.
2.T8? This can be used only for Z axis, X and Y should be rack/pinion if you can find smooth running ones (i could not) or belts at least 15mm wide HTD3 or HTD5, with 1:3 to 1:5 reduction, depending on the end pulley. Aim for 15mm of travel per revolution of the motor.
3. Nema 17 for Z is OK between 1.2 and 1.7A ones, for X and Y Nema 23 at 2A are enough with reduction.
2.T8? This can be used only for Z axis, X and Y should be rack/pinion if you can find smooth running ones (i could not) or belts at least 15mm wide HTD3 or HTD5, with 1:3 to 1:5 reduction, depending on the end pulley. Aim for 15mm of travel per revolution of the motor.
3. Nema 17 for Z is OK between 1.2 and 1.7A ones, for X and Y Nema 23 at 2A are enough with reduction.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 Sep 2021 18:51 #220163
by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic Stow-A-Way Plasma Cutter Table
For a 2400 sheet, I'd suggest 2500 travel minimum. That gives you 50mm each end so sheet placement is not critical
The length of the linear rail would be 2500 plus the distance between the outer edges of the linear carriages plus an allowance for home and limit switch travel (25-50mm). 2800 rails should go close with say carriages 275mm apart..
Nema 23's are adequate. But the extensive engineering we did showed small NEMA34's were required for optimum acceleration (if your table is rigid enough to handle the inertial forces) with a 5:1 reduction and 40-60mm pinion diameter.
I run 2 x NEMA34s with 5:1 reduction the Y axis and a 2 amp Nema 24 with 3:1 reduction on the lighter x axis
These are NOT entry level chinese motors.
The length of the linear rail would be 2500 plus the distance between the outer edges of the linear carriages plus an allowance for home and limit switch travel (25-50mm). 2800 rails should go close with say carriages 275mm apart..
Nema 23's are adequate. But the extensive engineering we did showed small NEMA34's were required for optimum acceleration (if your table is rigid enough to handle the inertial forces) with a 5:1 reduction and 40-60mm pinion diameter.
I run 2 x NEMA34s with 5:1 reduction the Y axis and a 2 amp Nema 24 with 3:1 reduction on the lighter x axis
These are NOT entry level chinese motors.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
12 Sep 2021 19:44 #220362
by joeslide
Replied by joeslide on topic Stow-A-Way Plasma Cutter Table
Thanks for your response. Trying to understand the difference in these two designs:
Why the difference in dimensions and material selection in the gantry?
Is the second design better immune from vibration?
Are both designs equally capable?
Thanks,
Joseph
Why the difference in dimensions and material selection in the gantry?
Is the second design better immune from vibration?
Are both designs equally capable?
Thanks,
Joseph
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
12 Sep 2021 20:36 #220365
by Joco
Replied by Joco on topic Stow-A-Way Plasma Cutter Table
Don't forget the voltage Rod. From memory you are tickling those motors with some pretty angry blue pixies.I run 2 x NEMA34s with 5:1 reduction the Y axis and a 2 amp Nema 24 with 3:1 reduction on the lighter x axis
These are NOT entry level chinese motors.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
12 Sep 2021 20:55 #220367
by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic Stow-A-Way Plasma Cutter Table
Yeh, 64 volts AC on the same drivers as shown in the second video which gives about 90 volts at the motor..
First video uses a cheap parallel port, 2nd video uses Mesa hardware and high end Lam stepper drivers.
If you are going to build a 2400 long table, please go with a Mesa 7i96 or 7i76e with a Mesa THCAD.
The extra $200 it will cost you is insignificant in the total budget and provide vastly superior results.
First video uses a cheap parallel port, 2nd video uses Mesa hardware and high end Lam stepper drivers.
If you are going to build a 2400 long table, please go with a Mesa 7i96 or 7i76e with a Mesa THCAD.
The extra $200 it will cost you is insignificant in the total budget and provide vastly superior results.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19106
- Thank you received: 6398
12 Sep 2021 21:19 #220369
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Stow-A-Way Plasma Cutter Table
The second video was using 72V DC to power the drives, Sanyo Denki Nema 23 motors at 2.4A.
After finishing that machine i did push it to 68 meters per minute with 3000mm/s/s acceleration, the reduction belts failed after about 4 back and forth!
Oh and the difference, the second one can cut all day every day without a hitch, even 24h days.
After finishing that machine i did push it to 68 meters per minute with 3000mm/s/s acceleration, the reduction belts failed after about 4 back and forth!
Oh and the difference, the second one can cut all day every day without a hitch, even 24h days.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 Sep 2021 06:13 #220400
by Joco
Replied by Joco on topic Stow-A-Way Plasma Cutter Table
68m/min!!! Yikes. I was feeling adventurous doing 30m/min at 3m/s/s. Which in all honesty is way more than I can possibly hope to cut at given the amps I can bring to bear. Even from a rapids point of view its more than is needed. The table is not that THAT big that it needs to whizz about at those speeds to get into position.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19106
- Thank you received: 6398
13 Sep 2021 11:16 #220424
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Stow-A-Way Plasma Cutter Table
All that speed is useless for plasma, max speed on any Hypertherm chart is 7.8m/m !
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: snowgoer540
Time to create page: 0.160 seconds