ECAM 5 POST Processors
- gravedigger
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
04 Nov 2025 09:00 #337797
by gravedigger
ECAM 5 POST Processors was created by gravedigger
I’m just getting started with LinuxCNC and have switched over from Mach4. I’ve been using the Italian ECAM 5 software and would like to continue using it. How different is the G-code between Mach and LinuxCNC? What are the main differences?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
-
- Away
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4687
- Thank you received: 1433
04 Nov 2025 11:09 #337804
by Todd Zuercher
Replied by Todd Zuercher on topic ECAM 5 POST Processors
The G-code is not very different and for the most part should work.
The biggest difference is that you should set a path blending tolerance at the start of the g-code in Linuxcnc. This will be a g-code line something like G64 P0.001 Q0.001.
Other differences will be with sub program calls and O-codes and canned cycles. But unless you are doing parametric g-code (unlikely with CAM produced code) it won't matter.
Linuxcnc's G-code is also similar to a lot of Fanuc code, and with similar exceptions as with Mach3.
The biggest difference is that you should set a path blending tolerance at the start of the g-code in Linuxcnc. This will be a g-code line something like G64 P0.001 Q0.001.
Other differences will be with sub program calls and O-codes and canned cycles. But unless you are doing parametric g-code (unlikely with CAM produced code) it won't matter.
Linuxcnc's G-code is also similar to a lot of Fanuc code, and with similar exceptions as with Mach3.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.067 seconds