- Posts: 28
- Thank you received: 0
ECAM 5 POST Processors
- gravedigger
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
11 months 4 weeks ago #337797
by gravedigger
ECAM 5 POST Processors was created by gravedigger
I’m just getting started with LinuxCNC and have switched over from Mach4. I’ve been using the Italian ECAM 5 software and would like to continue using it. How different is the G-code between Mach and LinuxCNC? What are the main differences?
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4793
- Thank you received: 1480
11 months 4 weeks ago #337804
by Todd Zuercher
Replied by Todd Zuercher on topic ECAM 5 POST Processors
The G-code is not very different and for the most part should work.
The biggest difference is that you should set a path blending tolerance at the start of the g-code in Linuxcnc. This will be a g-code line something like G64 P0.001 Q0.001.
Other differences will be with sub program calls and O-codes and canned cycles. But unless you are doing parametric g-code (unlikely with CAM produced code) it won't matter.
Linuxcnc's G-code is also similar to a lot of Fanuc code, and with similar exceptions as with Mach3.
The biggest difference is that you should set a path blending tolerance at the start of the g-code in Linuxcnc. This will be a g-code line something like G64 P0.001 Q0.001.
Other differences will be with sub program calls and O-codes and canned cycles. But unless you are doing parametric g-code (unlikely with CAM produced code) it won't matter.
Linuxcnc's G-code is also similar to a lot of Fanuc code, and with similar exceptions as with Mach3.
- billykid
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 488
- Thank you received: 83
11 months 2 weeks ago - 11 months 2 weeks ago #338347
by billykid
Replied by billykid on topic ECAM 5 POST Processors
I use ecam, as soon as I can I'll send you mine, it works well.
Last edit: 11 months 2 weeks ago by billykid.
- Miller Turner
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 27
- Thank you received: 1
4 months 4 days ago #347369
by Miller Turner
Replied by Miller Turner on topic ECAM 5 POST Processors
Hi All,
Have you been using E-CAM for mill or lathe?
Have you been using E-CAM for mill or lathe?
- billykid
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 488
- Thank you received: 83
4 months 3 days ago #347388
by billykid
Replied by billykid on topic ECAM 5 POST Processors
I used eCAM 5 and I'm happy with it, now I got the new 6 for a small CNC. I don't use it much, it's not my job, but the lathe part, according to a friend who uses it on a CNC lathe that we retrofitted together, is excellent.
- Becksvill
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 224
- Thank you received: 115
1 month 3 weeks ago #349568
by Becksvill
Replied by Becksvill on topic ECAM 5 POST Processors
I also use E cam
i have a post i modified main things i had to fix are threading g33.
everything else in the post i have checked works well i use it on a production cnc lathe running linuxcnc.
Ecam is absolutely awesome. way better than fusion 360 lathe cam in my opinion and i used both for 2 years
my post currently still has one issue left. when using g97 constant spindle speed the post still outputs a D value for max speed. and linuxcnc throws a error on this so currently i just delete that code from the file. but it's on the list to fix at some stage.
i have a post i modified main things i had to fix are threading g33.
everything else in the post i have checked works well i use it on a production cnc lathe running linuxcnc.
Ecam is absolutely awesome. way better than fusion 360 lathe cam in my opinion and i used both for 2 years
my post currently still has one issue left. when using g97 constant spindle speed the post still outputs a D value for max speed. and linuxcnc throws a error on this so currently i just delete that code from the file. but it's on the list to fix at some stage.
Time to create page: 0.333 seconds