qtdragonhd / probing
- chernogorsky
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 34
- Thank you received: 1
05 Aug 2024 20:59 - 05 Aug 2024 20:59 #307032
by chernogorsky
qtdragonhd / probing was created by chernogorsky
Hi,
Im trying to get probing working
currently it looks like working all the functions I need but cant set up tool dia measurement
It test the dia with Z=0*, not 0*-Z_CLEARANCE
so the flow is
1. do probe_tool_with_toolsetter
1.1 touch TS
1.2 go back Z_CLEARANCE (Z = *0 + Z_CLEARANCE)
2. perform XMinus
2.1 Go to X+ # move X - edge_length- xy_clearance
2.2 Go down with z_clearance_down (Z = Z - Z_CLEARANCE == *0)
2.3 Perform probe('xplus')
on 2.3 I have an issue, since its try to locate the edge of the TS with Z = top_of_TS == *0
lcnc: 2.9.3
Im trying to get probing working
currently it looks like working all the functions I need but cant set up tool dia measurement
It test the dia with Z=0*, not 0*-Z_CLEARANCE
so the flow is
1. do probe_tool_with_toolsetter
1.1 touch TS
1.2 go back Z_CLEARANCE (Z = *0 + Z_CLEARANCE)
2. perform XMinus
2.1 Go to X+ # move X - edge_length- xy_clearance
2.2 Go down with z_clearance_down (Z = Z - Z_CLEARANCE == *0)
2.3 Perform probe('xplus')
on 2.3 I have an issue, since its try to locate the edge of the TS with Z = top_of_TS == *0
lcnc: 2.9.3
Last edit: 05 Aug 2024 20:59 by chernogorsky.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmorley
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 7844
- Thank you received: 2109
07 Aug 2024 01:48 #307133
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic qtdragonhd / probing
You may already know this but here is the function qtvcp calls for tool diameter probing (probe_tool_z_diam):
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master...obe_routines.py#L314
Can you describe, using this code where the problem is?
If I understand you properly, you are saying the tool doesn't lower enough to touch the probe on the side of the tool when soide probing in X+ direction.
Does that mean when doing X- probing the tool _is_ low enough?
Chris
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master...obe_routines.py#L314
Can you describe, using this code where the problem is?
If I understand you properly, you are saying the tool doesn't lower enough to touch the probe on the side of the tool when soide probing in X+ direction.
Does that mean when doing X- probing the tool _is_ low enough?
Chris
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chernogorsky
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 34
- Thank you received: 1
07 Aug 2024 18:24 #307202
by chernogorsky
Replied by chernogorsky on topic qtdragonhd / probing
Hi Chris,
The problem as I see it
The time we go to line
# move X - edge_length- xy_clearance
we are at Z = 0* (found by probe_tool_with_toolsetter) + Z_CLEARANCE (made at the end of probe_tool_with_toolsetter)
and then we start probing xplus with Z move = Z_CLEARANCE, meanse we are doing probing on Z = 0*
The problem as I see it
The time we go to line
# move X - edge_length- xy_clearance
we are at Z = 0* (found by probe_tool_with_toolsetter) + Z_CLEARANCE (made at the end of probe_tool_with_toolsetter)
and then we start probing xplus with Z move = Z_CLEARANCE, meanse we are doing probing on Z = 0*
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmorley
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 7844
- Thank you received: 2109
09 Aug 2024 06:12 #307291
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic qtdragonhd / probing
Ok I see what you mean. What dimension should we use for Z depth?
Should it be 2x Z clearance?
Should it be 2x Z clearance?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmorley
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 7844
- Thank you received: 2109
10 Aug 2024 06:03 #307400
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic qtdragonhd / probing
I did some work on this in master. It now lowers/raises the tool 2x z_clearance.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chernogorsky
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 34
- Thank you received: 1
15 Aug 2024 13:56 #307817
by chernogorsky
Replied by chernogorsky on topic qtdragonhd / probing
Will check on master and be back
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chernogorsky
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 34
- Thank you received: 1
15 Aug 2024 16:48 #307828
by chernogorsky
Replied by chernogorsky on topic qtdragonhd / probing
It looks like with 2x Z it works
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmorley
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 7844
- Thank you received: 2109
15 Aug 2024 17:03 #307829
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic qtdragonhd / probing
Excellent.
Is there other things that need to be addressed to make it better?
Is there other things that need to be addressed to make it better?
The following user(s) said Thank You: chernogorsky
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chernogorsky
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 34
- Thank you received: 1
15 Aug 2024 20:29 #307837
by chernogorsky
Replied by chernogorsky on topic qtdragonhd / probing
It does not set dia to the tool, not sure if its expected beheavior, but its minor.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmorley
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 7844
- Thank you received: 2109
16 Aug 2024 05:12 #307882
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic qtdragonhd / probing
Do you think a dialog to confirm that you wish to update the probed diameter in the tool table would be better or just always update?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: cmorley
Time to create page: 0.112 seconds