As mentioned, with only the refClockSyncCycles="-1" parameter, the axis makes noise, but it's only for reconfirmation.
Parameter values ​​are with refClockSyncCycles="-1"
ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x06 return 0x00000000 0
ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x06 return 0x00000000 0
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x06 return 0x00000000 0
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x06 return 0x00000000 0
ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x03 return Failed to upload SDO: Input/output error
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x03 return SDO transfer aborted with code 0x06010001: Attempt to read a write-only object
ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x09 return 0x00030d40 200000
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x09 return 0x00000000 0

I can't reverse I/O with the drive. I/O is always 0, the drives follow. I would have to change everything hal, but this configuration works fine with Debian 10 and now also with Trixie, but with refClockSyncCycles="1"

The pin pll , oscillation value about 1 second value 0 after 4210619, after 1 second restar with 0

@rodw

rodw wrote:

Hakan wrote:

grandixximo's linuxcnc-ethercat repo, right?
That pll-err value shows it's not the linuxcnc standard code. That oscillates around zero.
 
Please expand on what you mean here.

This is a standard RIP install of Debian 2.10 except its in a folder under /usr/lib, grandixximos driver built from source, Ethercat from repos. That should make no difference. For me, latency etc is fine on my hardware which makes it weird.

 

In Scott's linuxcnc-ethercat repo pll-err oscillates around 0.
In grandixximo's repo pll-err oscillates around that number 992000 something.
It's not necessarily wrong, it was just how I could tell.

I only tested refClockSyncCycles="1" without writing syncToRefClock, and the machine worked flawlessly.

The lcec.0.pll-err pin in this case reported a value oscillating from approximately 991902 to 994498.

The rest remained the same:
<dcConf assignActivate="300" sync0Cycle="*1" sync0Shift="0"/>

The result is :

ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x06 return Failed to upload SDO: Input/output error
ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x06 return Failed to upload SDO: Input/output error
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x06 return 0x00000000 0
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x06 return 0x00000000 0
ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x03 return SDO transfer aborted with code 0x06010000: Unsupported access to an object
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x03 return SDO transfer aborted with code 0x06010001: Attempt to read a write-only object
ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x09 return 0x00030d40 200000
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x09 return 0x00000000 0

Yes machine work only with refClockSyncCycles="-1" syncToRefClock="false"

Initially, everything seemed to be working fine, because I was testing a system with smaller motors, always from the same manufacturer, not connected to the mechanics. I noticed the problem when I started moving the axes on a real machine. Here's my experience:
-First of all, on Debian 10 with EtherCAT 1.5.2, I never used the :syncToRefClock parameter, only refClockSyncCycles.
-On a real machine with an ASD2 Delta drive, with the first I/O node being the same, if I set the refClockSyncCycles parameter to -1, the axes shook at the first movement.
If I set the refClockSyncCycles parameter to 1, the machine worked 99.9% of the time; only very rarely was I forced to reboot the system because the axes made noise the first time they were restarted.

Still on Debian 10 with ethercat 1.5.2, with the same I/O node, with a Veichy drive, the refClockSyncCycles=1 parameter causes the axes to shake. I had to set refClockSyncCycles=-1 to work without problems.

Debian Trixie ethercat 1.6.9, Veichy drive machine. I initially set the Debian 10 xml file, so with only refClockSyncCycles=-1, the machine makes noise.
I then modified the xml with refClockSyncCycles=-1 and syncToRefClock="false" and now the machine works correctly.

I haven't been able to test Debian Trixie with the ASD2 drive, but I think at this point it will behave the same as Debian 10, namely:
refClockSyncCycles=1 and syncToRefClock="false"

I therefore assume that the syncToRefClock="true" parameter is set by default if not added to the XML file.

the result is :

ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x06 return 0x00000000 0
ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x06 return Failed to upload SDO: Input/output error
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x06 return 0x00000000 0
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x06 return 0x00000000 0
ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x03 return Failed to upload SDO: Input/output error
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C33 0x03 return SDO transfer aborted with code 0x06010001: Attempt to read a write-only object
ethercat upload -p 0 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x09 return 0x00030d40 200000
ethercat upload -p 1 -t uint32 0x1C32 0x09 return 0x00000000 0


I've already tested only refClockSyncCycles="-1" without syncToRefClock="true" and the problem persists.

I've also tested refClockSyncCycles="1" and syncToRefClock="true"
and the problem persists.

Do you want me to try deleting refClockSyncCycles="1" and leaving only syncToRefClock="true"?

Sometimes you do not have enough room for the tool outside of the machine limits.
Install home switches, set the tool centered above the part and set your G54 offsets and it will likely work fine. 

the radius error is related to your gcode. Sometimes from running absolute instead of incremental  arcs or vice versa,

Hakan wrote:

grandixximo's linuxcnc-ethercat repo, right?
That pll-err value shows it's not the linuxcnc standard code. That oscillates around zero.
 

Please expand on what you mean here.

This is a standard RIP install of Debian 2.10 except its in a folder under /usr/lib, grandixximos driver built from source, Ethercat from repos. That should make no difference. For me, latency etc is fine on my hardware which makes it weird.
 

grandixximo's linuxcnc-ethercat repo, right?
That pll-err value shows it's not the linuxcnc standard code. That oscillates around zero.

I have looked in the code but don't see why it does what it does.
It is supposed to work like this
When the syncToRefClock option is given the "-" is ignored, "true" means to switch on, any other string means to not activate the pll code.
In lack of the syncToRefClock option, the "-" will switch on the pll code.
Your code doesn't react in that way.

Just be patient, I started from scratch today and got the framework working but some of the data is  incorrect.
In the mean time, learn how to build linuxcnc as a RUN IN PLACE version for testing
When I get a bit further, you will be able to clone my git repository and test it for me.