- Posts: 79
- Thank you received: 23
rodw wrote: Peter, a very timely reminder that there is no need to chase latency down to the nth degree. Without a base thread, latency can be far higher than what many people are striving for. I think a lot of people get far to carried away reducing it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
PCW wrote: Those issues are not likely to be latency related, even 100s of usec of latency
have negligible effect on the step generation and the maximum step rate is
complete unrelated to latency with Mesa cards.
If you have poor latency (but good enough to avoid real time errors)
You do need to have the DPLL setup and enabled to be able to generate
clean step signals.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The Feral Engineer wrote:
PCW wrote: Those issues are not likely to be latency related, even 100s of usec of latency
have negligible effect on the step generation and the maximum step rate is
complete unrelated to latency with Mesa cards.
If you have poor latency (but good enough to avoid real time errors)
You do need to have the DPLL setup and enabled to be able to generate
clean step signals.
How would I check this?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.