Building a 3-axis plasma table with mesa 7i96s, THCad-2 and nema23 steppers

About 8-10 years ago we looked at an entry level hi definition plasma table and it was AUD $130k direct from the manufacturer.

I have submitted my graduation project, so I have some space again to work on my plasma design. What do you think of it so far?The idea is to print all the gray parts in carbon-reinforced nylon

 

In the meantime, I’ve slowly started building the prototype.
I’ve decided to go with LinuxCNC in combination with the Mesa 7i96s and the THCAD-2.
All parts were initially 3D printed in ASA-CF.
In practice, it will have to be determined whether this material is strong and rigid enough.
If not, the parts will be replaced. For now, I want to test the concept first.
The axes are driven by 3Nm Nema 23 stepper motors and an HTD-5M timing belt with a 15-tooth pulley, without any gear reduction.
The frame will be made of stainless steel square tubing, 50x50x3 mm.

I’ve just started working on that.

Any tips or feedback are very welcome! I'm here to learn  

Agreed on the gear reduction or machining a smaller pulley. I think they make htd in 3mm pitch so you can reduce pulley size.

The goal with plasma is to accelerate as fast as possible to the desired cutting speed to minimize slag...... That's basically the entire goal..... The less time you are in-between stopping and cut speed the less slag you will have. So keep all motion components as light and strong as possible. That 80/20 t slot extrusion is heavy and weak (for the weight), use square tube instead.

Also 3d printed parts are fine for a prototype/hobby machine but you are building a machine that shoots sparks everywhere and makes things very hot. Plan for machining the parts out of AL if you want to use it in an industrial environment.

Hope that helps

Thanks, well spotted! I was hoping that 1/3200 microstepping would work.
Perhaps I will have to do a 1/3 reduction later. For now I think I'll try how this works.

The goal is to get linuxcnc up and running first and try to configure everything properly



The point of the 80x40 extrusion profile I certainly do not agree with as a mechanical engineer.
The 80/40 extrusion profile has a much higher stiffness compared to a normal tube. Especially compared to an aluminum tube.

For axample:
Aluminium extrusion profile L=1200mm (2.9 kg) vs aluminium 50x50x2 tube L=1200mm (3.6kg)

Comparison of Bending Resistance
ProfileDirection (axis)                                        Section Modulus (W) 

80x40 extrusion
Major axis (80 mm high) → bending about        X = 8,898,884 mm³ 
Minor axis (40 mm high) → bending about        Y = 120,303 mm³

50x50x2 mm box
Any axis (symmetric) → c = 25 mm                    X and Y = 5,912 mm³

Key Differences:

In the x-axis, the 80x40 profile has ~1500× higher section modulus (1500x stronger!) and is 20% less heavy than the 50x50x2 box.

In the y-axis, it still has ~20× higher section modulus (20x stronger!).

My bad, aluminium is about 1.2 kg for 1200mm
So it is about 2.5 times as heavy but many times stronger against deflection.
That is why the choice was made for the 80x40 extrusion profile.

The guides weigh a lot more there, more could be gained there.