input shaping. Feature Request

Yes it does, it just avoids the resonant speeds by lowering feed rate.
3D printers move at very fast rate with huge accelerations and use belts that get stretchy at those rates, so for us it wont change much, if anything.
It works for X and Y axis only, we have a bit more, well plenty more when we count in the joints.
Mills and lathes have other vibration issues that input shaping can not fix.

pinder wrote:

Hello from Pinder.

I was looking at how much difference Klipper with input shaping make in 3d printing.
I was hoping this would be a nice feature for Routers Lasers and plasma Cutter.

I've had this same thought. I think it definitely has application here, especially where there is no real interaction between the cutting head and the material (e.g. plasma, laser, etc.). I've mentioned it before outside of the forum. I briefly looked into the math Klipper employs, and then got side tracked. It would require updating/rewriting at least portions of the trajectory planner.

There's also a whole other component necessary to measure the resonance in the system.

It would definitely be fun to test. Especially for changes in direction with my Y axis, it would be pretty easy to see if it made any difference.

I looked into it briefly one day. I got side tracked because they do all of their trajectory planning in Python which I thought was interesting.

The project is very well documented. I would think between the documentation and the code to look at it could be ported over for us to at least try. The measurement portion may just basically drop in and be usable. Id have to find time to do digging.