×
Forum Header
Trying to optimize base period, etc.
04 Mar 2016 16:44 #71046
by nerdsite
Replied by nerdsite on topic Trying to optimize base period, etc.
Ignore it unless it takes your arm off
Actually I found that my motor-ballscrew ratios were wrong and it gave me 2x leeway. I ran things at 4 usteps and it seems to work. The base time is 100,000. Does that seem reasonable? Steps are 8000 steps/in using a conservative 5k/5k/10k/10k for the step timings. Should be adequate.
Actually I found that my motor-ballscrew ratios were wrong and it gave me 2x leeway. I ran things at 4 usteps and it seems to work. The base time is 100,000. Does that seem reasonable? Steps are 8000 steps/in using a conservative 5k/5k/10k/10k for the step timings. Should be adequate.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
04 Mar 2016 17:45 #71053
by andypugh
That seems long to me.
There is some advantage in having a shorter base period even if you don't need the step rate, because the step-rate "granularity" is reduced.
Replied by andypugh on topic Trying to optimize base period, etc.
base time is 100,000. Does that seem reasonable?
That seems long to me.
There is some advantage in having a shorter base period even if you don't need the step rate, because the step-rate "granularity" is reduced.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
04 Mar 2016 18:00 #71054
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Trying to optimize base period, etc.
I agree, you should run the base thread as fast as you can without getting real time errors.
Running it slower than necessary just increases the likelihood of stalls caused by sub-harmonics
exciting stepper resonances at unfavourable speeds
Running it slower than necessary just increases the likelihood of stalls caused by sub-harmonics
exciting stepper resonances at unfavourable speeds
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
04 Mar 2016 18:09 #71056
by nerdsite
Replied by nerdsite on topic Trying to optimize base period, etc.
That's what stepconf creates. Can I manually change this in the ini file?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
04 Mar 2016 18:35 #71057
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Trying to optimize base period, etc.
Yes, you can just edit the number in the .ini file
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
08 Mar 2016 04:22 #71203
by nerdsite
Replied by nerdsite on topic Trying to optimize base period, etc.
This still didn't solve the problem, especially when I maximized the video screen. I then took out the external video card and ran it w/ the on-board video and viola! it work like it should (except it didn't have great latency). At least I didn't get any more realtime delays and was on right path.
Changing the video driver to 'vesa' w/ the external video card fixed that one. Latency was slightly worse then the native drivers, but not that bad. Maybe there's a better graphics card out there (PCI-e)
Changing the video driver to 'vesa' w/ the external video card fixed that one. Latency was slightly worse then the native drivers, but not that bad. Maybe there's a better graphics card out there (PCI-e)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.091 seconds