- Posts: 22011
- Thank you received: 7491
Hardware latency tests, used PC's
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
6 years 4 months ago - 6 years 4 months ago #172011
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Hardware latency tests, used PC's
Nope, you are not, although i can not recall any changes to latency histogram, so not sure if it has a version.
But tying it to the LinuxCNC version is a good idea.
Thank you.
Edit:
LinuxCNC has also a build number besides the general version.
But tying it to the LinuxCNC version is a good idea.
Thank you.
Edit:
LinuxCNC has also a build number besides the general version.
Last edit: 6 years 4 months ago by tommylight. Reason: More info
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- seuchato
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 381
- Thank you received: 126
6 years 4 months ago #172022
by seuchato
+ might be easier to depict
question: what is more "unique": Build No. or general version? What would users relate to?
- I have no Idea, how to extract that build No. from a bash script, help appreciated
Greez
chris
Replied by seuchato on topic Hardware latency tests, used PC's
tommylight wrote: ...
LinuxCNC has also a build number besides the general version.
+ might be easier to depict
question: what is more "unique": Build No. or general version? What would users relate to?
- I have no Idea, how to extract that build No. from a bash script, help appreciated
Greez
chris
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 22011
- Thank you received: 7491
6 years 4 months ago #172026
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Hardware latency tests, used PC's
apt list linuxcnc-uspace | awk '{print $2}'
shows
1:2.9.0~pre0.2228.gcda96a48f
The number behind pre0 is the build version, in my case 2228.
shows
1:2.9.0~pre0.2228.gcda96a48f
The number behind pre0 is the build version, in my case 2228.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- seuchato
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 381
- Thank you received: 126
6 years 4 months ago #172029
by seuchato
Replied by seuchato on topic Hardware latency tests, used PC's
OK, so, if the build No. is included in the package version, I suggest to stick with the package version. Any objections?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 22011
- Thank you received: 7491
6 years 4 months ago #172030
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Hardware latency tests, used PC's
No.
Thank you.
Thank you.
The following user(s) said Thank You: seuchato
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- seuchato
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 381
- Thank you received: 126
6 years 4 months ago #172058
by seuchato
Replied by seuchato on topic Hardware latency tests, used PC's
New version
Kindly have a look into it and let me know any bugs, amendments, ...
greez
chris
Kindly have a look into it and let me know any bugs, amendments, ...
greez
chris
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.134 seconds