Duplicate O word label error in version 2.6

I am using v2.6.0-pre0-5409-ge66e5c9 of linuxCNC
I have a bunch of custom code and GUI using GladeVCP and python

When I call the following o word file using a python MDI call it works the first time but the second time it gives me an error:
Duplicate o-word label on line 47 which is:
o<getnew> if [#2 GT 0]

My memory is a little shaky on this but I was running v2.4 about a year ago and this code worked I believe. I updated to the v2.6 pre version and now it does not. I know that its not a duplicate label but trying to figure out why it thinks so is what is driving me crazy. I lately have been under the assumption that it still has this gcode file in memory and therefore thinks its a duplicate but by checking the Linuxcnc.status before and after the call to this routine it says that the opened file before this call is the cut file that I am using and then after the call it says the same so I just don't know.

I am going to try and revert back to linuxCNC v2.5 and see if it works then. Here is the file printout:
o<tool> sub
;Call as:
; o<tool> call [1] [2]
G49 G20 G90

(PRINT, in tools prog 1=#1 and 2=#2)
G28.1 ;temp store current location
G53 G0 Z0
;Need to turn off spindle here.
#<_xput>= #[1000+#1]
#<_xget>= #[1000+#2]
#<_yput>= #[1100+#1]
#<_yget>= #[1100+#2]
#<_zput>= #[1200+#1]
#<_zget>= #[1200+#2]
#<_hput>= #[1300+#1]
#<_hget>= #[1300+#2]
(PRINT, init 0: put x=#<_xput> y=#<_yput> z=#<_zput>)
(PRINT, init 0: get x=#<_xget> y=#<_yget> z=#<_zget>)

(************************************************************)
(** Put Tool Back)
(************************************************************)
;if first passed parameter is not 0 then put tool up.
o<putback> if [#1 GT 0]
G0 X#<_xput> Y[#<_yput>+1] (go to tool PUT X,Y+1)
G53 G0 Z#<_zput>
G53 G0 Y#<_yput> (Slide Tool into Palette)
(PRINT, kin 1st param not 0: x1=#<_xput> y=#<_yput> z=#<_zput>)
(PRINT, 101 open)
M64 P0 (open Holder)
M66 P1 L2 Q0.5 (wait 500ms)
G53 G0 Z[#<_zput>+2] (lift Tool Holder up 2 inches to clear tool)
(PRINT, 101 Close)
M65 P0 (close Tool Holder)
M66 P1 L2 Q0.5 (wait 500ms)
o<putback> else
(PRINT, 101 else)
G53 G0 Z0
o<putback> endif
(PRINT, b4 102b)
(************************************************************)
(** Get New Tool)
(************************************************************)
(if second passed parameter is not 0 then get tool.)
(PRINT, b4 102a)
o<getnew> if [#2 GT 0]
(PRINT, after 102)
G53 G0 X#<_xget> Y#<_yget>
G53 G0 Z[#<_zget>+1.6]
(PRINT, in second param not 0: get x=#<_xget> y=#<_yget> z=#<_zget>)
(PRINT, 102 open)
M64 P0 (Blow Off Tool)
M66 P1 L2 Q0.5 (wait 500ms)
M65 P0
(PRINT, 102 close)
M66 P0 L3 Q0.5
(PRINT, 102 open)
M64 P0 (open Holder)
M66 P1 L2 Q0.5 (wait 500ms)
G53 G0 Z#<_zget> (Grab Tool)
(PRINT, 102 close)
M65 P0 (Close Holder)
M66 P1 L2 Q0.5 (wait 500ms)
G43.1 Z[#<_hget>+2] (load tool length offset)
G53 G0 Y[#<_yget>+1] (go to tool GET Y+1)
o<getnew> else
G49
o<getnew> endif
G53 G0 Z0
;TURN ON SPINDLE HERE
G53 G0 X#5161 Y#5162 ;Move to absolute X and Y stored from 28.1 command
G53 G0 Z#5163
(PRINT, Tool Exit)

o<tool> endsub
(PRINT, Tool Exit1)

M2

Misread code - delete

Thats what you get trying to read on a mobile phone :laugh:

Lol, I understand. In the email from the forum it had a response that I assume was yours Arceye. I didn't understand it but now I do As an update to this problem I downgraded to v2.5.3 and the problem went away. I know that does not necessarily mean that its a bug in v2.6 but I am going to have to stick with 2.5.3 I think. But I would like to report it to the dev team and don't know how.

Lol, I understand. In the email from the forum it had a response that I assume was yours Arceye. I didn't understand it but now I do

Thought I had it cracked when I could only see 4 lines at a time and misread which o block I was in :laugh:

Its all here

www.linuxcnc.org/index.php/french/compon...ticle/48-bug-reports

They need the bug to be reproduceable, so best to trim out bits that are hardware reliant, or M code routines they won't have.
Sometimes the problem disappears and that gives a clue.

Will need some clue as to the calling routine too

regards

I ran into this error but I'm new to subroutines so I don't know if this is expected when redefining subroutines while the machine is on or a bug.

The error message is:

emc/task/emctask.cc 397: interp_error: 4: duplicate O-word label - already defined in line 3: 'o100 if [ #1 GT 5]'
4: duplicate O-word label - already defined in line 3: 'o100 if [ #1 GT 5]'


To reproduce define the subroutine:
o100 starts on line 3.

Now call the subroutine (I am using the MDI tab in Axis UI):

o<test1> call [20]

The message 'true' pops up in the notifications.

Edit test1.ngc and insert an extra blank line so the o100 if statement is on line 4. Save the changes.

Call the subroutine again:

o<test1> call [20]

The error occurs. I'm using master branch (cloned March 19 2018).

That sounds wrong, and unexpected.
I wonder if the system is somehow cacheing the old subroutine file?

Does it always error even if you don't edit the file?