G-code error

More
11 years 2 months ago #61109 by BigJohnT
Replied by BigJohnT on topic G-code error
Not disputing the "CNC" experts on other forums but my old DX-32 control and IIRC (I'm too lazy to look) my even older Anilam 1100M control require you to make a "approach" move into the compensated path. The DX-32 the "approach" move is the next line after G41/42 and must be equal to or larger than the tool diameter. So it is definitely not a LinuxCNC "thing".

JT

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #61111 by Todd Zuercher
Replied by Todd Zuercher on topic G-code error
I'll be honest I don't really use cutter comp. CAM takes care of all that for me. If I were coding by hand I would almost certainly use it alot. But I still think proper lead-ins and lead-outs are necessary on most if not all controls to get a proper cut (without gouges) when using cutter comp. Most controls may not require them, to run the code, but they still are needed to make a proper part. Maybe Linuxcnc is trying to be too clever in its attempts to save us from ourselves.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #61113 by BigJohnT
Replied by BigJohnT on topic G-code error
I'd rather it be clever when I'm being not so clever. It does make sense that the first move after G41/42 has to be at least big enough to get into the compensated position.

JT

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #61116 by allenwg2005
Replied by allenwg2005 on topic G-code error
Speaking for myself, LCNC can have all the quirks it likes!
The fact that it's so flexible and can be adapted to so may different machines makes it worth every dime.
Oh that's right; it's completely free!
I'll put up with whatever “thing” it comes up with for the trade off on the price tag.

Thanks again guys, Allen

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 1.327 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum