G71
- r.lol
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 1
07 Jun 2019 16:31 #136215
by r.lol
Replied by r.lol on topic G71
If I comment out those errors attached images are what we get.
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 23230
- Thank you received: 4900
07 Jun 2019 17:23 #136235
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic G71
It doesn't look like you are selecting any tool.
And I think that the error messages are reasonable, there is no way to make those shapes with any real tool.
And I think that the error messages are reasonable, there is no way to make those shapes with any real tool.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eneias_eringer
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 36
- Thank you received: 8
31 Jan 2020 14:23 #156255
by eneias_eringer
Replied by eneias_eringer on topic G71
Hello @andypugh and thankyou by the great work on this G71 !!!!! But i am facing problems when i try to use a o<>call before the G71 , in my case i use a o<m6>call to change tools , and when i call a tool before the g71, the rough shows but dont execute ... my solution now is just call g43h on sub , if i put a T M6 the cicle shows but dont execute...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 23230
- Thank you received: 4900
31 Jan 2020 18:00 #156264
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic G71
Be aware that there is work underway to incorporate a G71(with pockets) into LinuxCNC base code.
Have you considered using a G-code remap of M6 rather than an O<m6> call? I think this would probably work better, and would mean that you can use CAM G-code unmodified.
If you have an existing G-code subroutine then remapping M6 to call that directly is very easy.
Have you considered using a G-code remap of M6 rather than an O<m6> call? I think this would probably work better, and would mean that you can use CAM G-code unmodified.
If you have an existing G-code subroutine then remapping M6 to call that directly is very easy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eneias_eringer
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 36
- Thank you received: 8
31 Jan 2020 18:59 #156267
by eneias_eringer
Replied by eneias_eringer on topic G71
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eneias_eringer
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 36
- Thank you received: 8
31 Jan 2020 19:20 #156269
by eneias_eringer
Replied by eneias_eringer on topic G71
got it this way:
T0101
M61Q1
and is working now ...but i dont know were is the problem !!!
T0101
M61Q1
and is working now ...but i dont know were is the problem !!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 23230
- Thank you received: 4900
11 Feb 2020 13:29 #157049
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic G71
If you have remapped T to do a tool change there should not be any need for M61.
Does your remap include an M6?
Does your remap include an M6?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eneias_eringer
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 36
- Thank you received: 8
11 Feb 2020 16:15 #157077
by eneias_eringer
Replied by eneias_eringer on topic G71
andypugh , my problem is , if i do not put the M61 , G71 is show on "graphic" but dont execute , like in my video . this problem only ocurr when i use a subprogram or a remap code to change tools , in my tests, if you only put a T01M6 on a sub an try , have the same problem.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Barry
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 54
- Thank you received: 4
19 Jun 2020 13:01 #172075
by Barry
Replied by Barry on topic G71
Are there any instructions on how to setup and install the remap?
Thank you,
Barry
Thank you,
Barry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.114 seconds