Classicladder Subroutines
- sqmathlete
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 118
- Thank you received: 17
21 Mar 2018 01:13 #107648
by sqmathlete
Classicladder Subroutines was created by sqmathlete
Hi all,
I am working on a CNC Lathe that has a lot of functions that I want to handle in classic ladder by compartmentalizing things into sub routines. Is there a way to increase the number of call coils for subroutines? I had hoped that by increasing numSections that this would happen but, apparently not...
Kind Regards,
Dan
I am working on a CNC Lathe that has a lot of functions that I want to handle in classic ladder by compartmentalizing things into sub routines. Is there a way to increase the number of call coils for subroutines? I had hoped that by increasing numSections that this would happen but, apparently not...
Kind Regards,
Dan
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmorley
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 7778
- Thank you received: 2075
21 Mar 2018 20:46 #107695
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic Classicladder Subroutines
The number of sub routines is not configurable - other then modifing and recompiling the program.
Depending on what you are doing - classicladder also supports sequential programming.
Sequential programming builds a state machine that runs other ladder routines as each state transitions.
Might be cleaner - might be a pain - i don't think it's used much.
Chris M
Depending on what you are doing - classicladder also supports sequential programming.
Sequential programming builds a state machine that runs other ladder routines as each state transitions.
Might be cleaner - might be a pain - i don't think it's used much.
Chris M
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- sqmathlete
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 118
- Thank you received: 17
30 Mar 2018 14:35 #108108
by sqmathlete
Replied by sqmathlete on topic Classicladder Subroutines
Sequential programming does seem to have potential and when you say "state machine" l can't help but think that that type of ladder logic may be useful with the ethercat hal-driver...I need to dig deeper. However for now, I found that by using the Mission pattern I have enough sub-routines to handle everything.
Should I choose to "modify and recompile" any idea what/where that file is called. I'm running the development files anyways. 10 subroutines for a state machine doesn't seem like much.
Kind regards,
Dan
Should I choose to "modify and recompile" any idea what/where that file is called. I'm running the development files anyways. 10 subroutines for a state machine doesn't seem like much.
Kind regards,
Dan
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.051 seconds