Another tool table offset question
Have you seen thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.emc.devel/6891 ?Is any work being done to include wear offsets or assignable offsets in Linux CNC..
I don't think that the patch has been included in Master, though I believe that it could be.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
This is great thanks. Where do I go to learn about patches? Using 2.5 Version now.
"man patch"
But you also need to be able to build LinuxCNC from source, so it's not a trivial undertaking.
wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?git
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I take it I just don't add the features = 64 line to my ini file.
No in 2.5
Possibly in Master. But I don't know if the patch has been accepted. (the problem is that no-one feels they have enough knowledge to accept patches)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
We are using the patch from the Link above and it works great. This is a very handy patch to LinuxCNC. I would like to see the wear offset table changed to accept diameter values but it is a great patch that moves LinuxCNC closer to a commercial control.
Where is the best place to suggest changes that lean more to the industrial commercial side of this industry. Owning a machine shop and just recently finishing our first LinuxCNC retrofit on a Turning Center we are just now starting a list that is "different" than we are used to. We have been running Fagor, Cincinnati, Fanuc and Mitsubishi controls and they are all a little different but handle certain things like wear offsets in a similar manner.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Possibly on the developers mailing list.Where is the best place to suggest changes that lean more to the industrial commercial side of this industry.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.