run from here does not work on latest 2.5 branch

More
21 Nov 2011 07:07 #14978 by mhaberler
Ok, so I replicated your setup after an hour.

I run Test.ngc .
I do nothing.
I get a message "clamp busy when it should be empty, program will stop".
I finally figure I need to press key 1 after starting within a certain time
I get a message "Spindle does not stop"
I figure I need to press some other key within a certain time

No, I wont figure this out.

You please invest your time first and narrow the error down to something manageable

Please remove any irrelevant stuff - afaict the pin I/O , time dependent and HAL input stuff is completely irrelevant for the bug you're claiming exists

If it is an oword/rfl bug you should be able to demonstrate with a main ngc program and a single subroutine, no pin io, not hal_input component, no fluff created by some CAM program.

Then return with a clear sequence of steps until the bug shows.

-m

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Nov 2011 08:02 - 21 Nov 2011 08:35 #14979 by grandixximo
I'm sorry i tough that the I/O stuff was relevant to the bug, but you are right it's not, i've been able to make a much simpler shorter and cleaner sequence.

please have a look at it.

the step to see the bug is playing test.ngc and see what it does, then load tool 3 (T3M6) play test2.ngc which is a trimmed version of the first test file and see what the machine should do if everything above the second o101 call was not there.

Now load again tool 3 (T3M6) open the first test file and try to run from the second o101 call (line 20), see that what you get is different from playing the test2.ngc which is the bug.

If you start from line 20 of first test file with no tool loaded, see the interpreter executing first and second o101 call without the drilling movement in between.

File Attachment:

File Name: nc_files-9...6583.zip
File Size:3 KB
Attachments:
Last edit: 21 Nov 2011 08:35 by grandixximo.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Nov 2011 08:19 #14980 by mhaberler
excellent.

Now note you have to spoon-feed us dull developer folks.

1. Now exactly what do I have to do?
2. What would you have expected?
3. What is wrong?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Nov 2011 08:37 #14981 by grandixximo
i was editing the post adding those information, i think now it's clear.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Nov 2011 09:49 #14982 by mhaberler
could you work with this example and modify it until your bug shows?


o100 sub
(debug, sub-1: 5400=#5400)
t#1m6
(debug, sub-2: 5400=#5400)
o100 endsub

o100 call [2]
(debug, #5400)
m2

-m

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Nov 2011 10:25 - 21 Nov 2011 11:07 #14984 by grandixximo
I attached the bug sequence.

File Attachment:

File Name: nc_files-5...0f70.zip
File Size:0 KB


the bug is that if you run from line 3 of test.ngc you get

sub-1: #5400=0
sub-1: #5400=1
sub-2: #5400=2
2
sub-1: #5400=2
sub-2: #5400=3
3

but this is what i think i should get

sub-1: #5400=0
sub-2: #5400=2
2
sub-1: #5400=2
sub-2: #5400=3
3

There should be no sub-1: #5400=1 because that was from the call in line 1 of test.ngc, such line should not exist since run from line should have skipped it.

Notice that what i expect is the same result as if you delete line 1 and 2 in test.ngc and you play it.

PS

Since silent gratitude is not of much use to anyone, i want to thank mhaberler for his patience and his time, i have no other words but thanks.
Attachments:
Last edit: 21 Nov 2011 11:07 by grandixximo.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Nov 2011 11:34 #14986 by mhaberler
ok, we have a case - that clearly is in error

I filed it as Bug ID 3440704: sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid..._id=6744&atid=106744

-Michael

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Nov 2011 16:16 #14995 by mhaberler

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 Nov 2011 01:34 - 22 Nov 2011 01:35 #15009 by grandixximo
I'm subscribed to the bug report, i think we can go on the discussion on sourceforge

For anyone interested here:

Bug ID 3440704: sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid..._id=6744&atid=106744
Last edit: 22 Nov 2011 01:35 by grandixximo.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.093 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum