programmed depths are shallow
15 Jun 2018 15:35 #112409
by dhanger
programmed depths are shallow was created by dhanger
Hello group-
For the last month or so I've developed an issue with my mill leaving all my programmed depths .003-.004 shallow. I've had LinuxCNC set up and running on this machine for over a year now without having this problem before, so I'm wondering if I may have set some parameter wrong inadvertently, although for the life of me I don't know what it could be.
I've been programming industrial CNC's for 25 years and built/reconfigured my own machines for the last 10, so this isn't some dumb rookie problem. I've chased down all the usual suspects and come up with nothing, which leads me to think it's something I've changed in LinuxCNC, but what, I don't know. One thing I've noticed that may be a clue--when I have a Z move to feed to depth, for example a recent program, feed to z-.050 and then feed in X, it will feed to z-.0476 first, then on the X move it will feed down to -.050 along with the X move, but still it's not cutting to depth.
Any clues for what to look for?
Dan
LinuxCNC 2.7
For the last month or so I've developed an issue with my mill leaving all my programmed depths .003-.004 shallow. I've had LinuxCNC set up and running on this machine for over a year now without having this problem before, so I'm wondering if I may have set some parameter wrong inadvertently, although for the life of me I don't know what it could be.
I've been programming industrial CNC's for 25 years and built/reconfigured my own machines for the last 10, so this isn't some dumb rookie problem. I've chased down all the usual suspects and come up with nothing, which leads me to think it's something I've changed in LinuxCNC, but what, I don't know. One thing I've noticed that may be a clue--when I have a Z move to feed to depth, for example a recent program, feed to z-.050 and then feed in X, it will feed to z-.0476 first, then on the X move it will feed down to -.050 along with the X move, but still it's not cutting to depth.
Any clues for what to look for?
Dan
LinuxCNC 2.7
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 Jun 2018 20:28 #112494
by joekline9
Replied by joekline9 on topic programmed depths are shallow
I think it has to do with the trajectory planner settings.
I had same issue a while back. I'll see if I can find how I fixed it.
I had same issue a while back. I'll see if I can find how I fixed it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 Jun 2018 21:23 #112496
by joekline9
Replied by joekline9 on topic programmed depths are shallow
Version 2.7 has new Trajectory planner.
Try putting:
G64 P.0001
at the top of your G code file.
For more info check docs under G64.
Try putting:
G64 P.0001
at the top of your G code file.
For more info check docs under G64.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 Jun 2018 21:14 #112514
by dhanger
Replied by dhanger on topic programmed depths are shallow
Hmm. I've been using G64 P.001 long before this problem came up.
Thanks,
Dan
Thanks,
Dan
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
24 Jun 2018 10:09 #112816
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic programmed depths are shallow
Wh
at you describe sounds like PID settings, but I can't see why they would change.
Normally I would suggest tool table, but assume you checked that.
at you describe sounds like PID settings, but I can't see why they would change.
Normally I would suggest tool table, but assume you checked that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
25 Jun 2018 14:04 #112846
by dhanger
Replied by dhanger on topic programmed depths are shallow
This is a stepper driven mill, so PID wouldn't apply. Yeah, checked the tool table several times, especially since I use TLO's a lot.
I've been trying to trace back what I might have done at the time I started having this problem. Only thing I can think of is that I did a bunch of re-wiring in the cabinet at the time (this is an old machine that I ripped out and replaced most of the electronics and had a rat's nest needing attention). In all my setups I've checked and re-checked TLO's, etc., but when the mill is running it all goes bad. I started wondering if maybe when I did the re-wiring I may have set up a situation where the Z axis signals may be affected by some EMI interference. Seems like a long shot, and everything worked well with the rat's nest. I haven't had a chance to really look at that, but a quick glance showed the motor cable and driver was well away from anything obvious.
It's very frustrating--I've been making compensations in the Z axis to work around it, but every once in a while the problem goes away and cuts as it should. Haven't ruined anything important yet, but I can feel it coming.....
Thanks,
Dan
I've been trying to trace back what I might have done at the time I started having this problem. Only thing I can think of is that I did a bunch of re-wiring in the cabinet at the time (this is an old machine that I ripped out and replaced most of the electronics and had a rat's nest needing attention). In all my setups I've checked and re-checked TLO's, etc., but when the mill is running it all goes bad. I started wondering if maybe when I did the re-wiring I may have set up a situation where the Z axis signals may be affected by some EMI interference. Seems like a long shot, and everything worked well with the rat's nest. I haven't had a chance to really look at that, but a quick glance showed the motor cable and driver was well away from anything obvious.
It's very frustrating--I've been making compensations in the Z axis to work around it, but every once in a while the problem goes away and cuts as it should. Haven't ruined anything important yet, but I can feel it coming.....
Thanks,
Dan
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
25 Jun 2018 15:03 #112850
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic programmed depths are shallow
If you are using Mesa cards then there might be a PID in the HAL even with steppers.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.114 seconds