GCode and XXYZ machine vs XYZ

More
10 Jan 2020 11:08 #154536 by ross_dev
Hello

I have been exporting gcode from a popular CAM package in order to test the first three stages of our machine. It is modeled in vismach as XYZ only and the gcode works well.

The real machine is XXYZ, do you know if any modification needs to be made to the gcode or the way the CAM exports it to take account of the additional X, or will LCNC just pass the commands to both x assuming a correctly configured ini?

Cheers and happy new year (belated!)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 Jan 2020 19:46 #154571 by tommylight

The real machine is XXYZ, do you know if any modification needs to be made to the gcode or the way the CAM exports it to take account of the additional X, or will LCNC just pass the commands to both x assuming a correctly configured ini?

No and yes.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ross_dev

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jan 2020 08:05 #154599 by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic GCode and XXYZ machine vs XYZ
You only have one X axis. The XXYZ string in your ini file is telling Linuxcnc which JOINTS (motors) make up your X AXIS.
So at a G code level, you only have a 3 Axis XYZ machine.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ross_dev

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jan 2020 09:18 #154745 by ross_dev
That's great thanks! Much obliged gents
The following user(s) said Thank You: rodw

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.109 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum