Moving Z to zero causes limit error, but limit is Z=0
- JetForMe
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 305
- Thank you received: 16
24 Oct 2020 03:39 #187063
by JetForMe
Moving Z to zero causes limit error, but limit is Z=0 was created by JetForMe
I have an ongoing issue where generated gcode does
G53 G0 Z0.
And LinuxCNC complains. Thing is, it's set up such that that's the upper Z limit (MAX_LIMIT = 0.0). Shouldn't it be willing to go TO the limit (obviously not past it)?
G53 G0 Z0.
And LinuxCNC complains. Thing is, it's set up such that that's the upper Z limit (MAX_LIMIT = 0.0). Shouldn't it be willing to go TO the limit (obviously not past it)?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Online
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 19499
- Thank you received: 6538
24 Oct 2020 08:04 #187076
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Moving Z to zero causes limit error, but limit is Z=0
What's the complaint ?
I use that daily and have no issues with it.
I use that daily and have no issues with it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MaHa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 405
- Thank you received: 163
24 Oct 2020 11:10 #187093
by MaHa
Replied by MaHa on topic Moving Z to zero causes limit error, but limit is Z=0
If you set MAX_LIMIT = 0.0, retracting to G53 G0 Z0 it will hit the limit. MAX_LIMIT = 0.001 or greater will work
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JetForMe
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 305
- Thank you received: 16
26 Oct 2020 19:26 #187334
by JetForMe
Replied by JetForMe on topic Moving Z to zero causes limit error, but limit is Z=0
That it exceeds the travel limits.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JetForMe
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 305
- Thank you received: 16
26 Oct 2020 19:27 #187335
by JetForMe
That seems imprecise, and a bug, no?
Replied by JetForMe on topic Moving Z to zero causes limit error, but limit is Z=0
If you set MAX_LIMIT = 0.0, retracting to G53 G0 Z0 it will hit the limit. MAX_LIMIT = 0.001 or greater will work
That seems imprecise, and a bug, no?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PCW
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 17987
- Thank you received: 4834
26 Oct 2020 19:46 #187337
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Moving Z to zero causes limit error, but limit is Z=0
Not really. LinuxCNC uses actual position when limit checking and there will always
be some position error relative to commanded position so a small amount of headroom is needed.
be some position error relative to commanded position so a small amount of headroom is needed.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 5712
- Thank you received: 2088
26 Oct 2020 23:13 #187352
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic Moving Z to zero causes limit error, but limit is Z=0
To me that seems very precise and correct.
If you set MAX_LIMIT = 0.0, retracting to G53 G0 Z0 it will hit the limit. MAX_LIMIT = 0.001 or greater will work
That seems imprecise, and a bug, no?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rodw
-
- Away
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 10816
- Thank you received: 3563
27 Oct 2020 08:07 #187392
by rodw
X 2
The work envelope needs to be inside the limits.
Replied by rodw on topic Moving Z to zero causes limit error, but limit is Z=0
To me that seems very precise and correct.
If you set MAX_LIMIT = 0.0, retracting to G53 G0 Z0 it will hit the limit. MAX_LIMIT = 0.001 or greater will work
That seems imprecise, and a bug, no?
X 2
The work envelope needs to be inside the limits.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.061 seconds