Plasmac filter errors on G90/91
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 5710
- Thank you received: 2087
18 Nov 2021 05:17 #226835
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic Plasmac filter errors on G90/91
No one at the same time obviously as it has always been like this. There was some work started on it a long time ago but never finished as it it not to important because most folk seem to use a PP that will do the job for them.It actually makes you wonder how many people use spotting and hole cutting features if it not ben flagged before.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 5710
- Thank you received: 2087
18 Nov 2021 05:22 #226836
by phillc54
I do have a lot on at the moment so I don't know when I will get time to look at it. Some of the work I am doing at the moment will make that bug redundant anyway so I guess you could almost say I am working on it
Replied by phillc54 on topic Plasmac filter errors on G90/91
It is up to the developer as to what features should be available, so an easy fix for me is to remove all the #<holes> code.Its really up to the user to decide how to use the available features.
I thought the SheetCam hole code that I use was very simple.The sheetcam hole processing I shared on this forum earlier includes some pretty advanced features and need manual setting up by the user in his tool set, so to my mind, its easier to just let Plasmac do it.
I do have a lot on at the moment so I don't know when I will get time to look at it. Some of the work I am doing at the moment will make that bug redundant anyway so I guess you could almost say I am working on it
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.194 seconds