2.8.2/Buster: should I use isolcpus=1 or cpuset
- tatel
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 39
- Thank you received: 16
16 Jun 2023 21:46 #273719
by tatel
Replied by tatel on topic 2.8.2/Buster: should I use isolcpus=1 or cpuset
Hi. I think you should at least have a try... and please let us know what works best for you.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DanRoscigno
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
16 Jun 2023 23:58 #273727
by DanRoscigno
Replied by DanRoscigno on topic 2.8.2/Buster: should I use isolcpus=1 or cpuset
With taskset on the latency-histogram process the jitter dropped to 0.6. I then moved the six glxgears to that CPU and jitter was 2. I kept adding glxgears until jitter rose to 3, it took four more for a total of ten glxgears.
So, I think taskset is a good thing. The latency-histogram seems to only use a single CPU, but I am guessing that linuxcnc may use more, but I have not tested that yet. I am going to let this run for a couple hours and then document it all (maybe on a more standard Debian install as not everyone grew up writing xinitrc's and running startx).
Thanks for your help, this thread was very helpful.
So, I think taskset is a good thing. The latency-histogram seems to only use a single CPU, but I am guessing that linuxcnc may use more, but I have not tested that yet. I am going to let this run for a couple hours and then document it all (maybe on a more standard Debian install as not everyone grew up writing xinitrc's and running startx).
Thanks for your help, this thread was very helpful.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.108 seconds