Emergency! join 0 following error
22 Nov 2010 08:49 - 22 Nov 2010 08:50 #5522
by KenC
Emergency! join 0 following error was created by KenC
Hi,
I have no idea where to catagorise this question please move it as you see fit.
My machine is mech mate, double steppers on rack & pinion on the Y(long)-axis & 1 motor for the X(gantry) & Z-axis.
All was well carving away for many months & I decided to re-surfact the spoil board.
I generated a g-code of pocketting a 2540x1340 area & reference the origin at -35,-35 using 2" end mill feed Z at 1.5mm & 9000mm/m.
All went well & suddenly the machine stopped & gave the following error message on AXIS on the lower right corner says:-
Joint 0 following error
I checked the hardware & nothing was jaming the rail of other mechanism, went throught the drivers to find loose connections, measured the voltages & motor temperature, all are well.
What could had went wrong? I'm now stranded with work progress...
Please help
Thanks in advance.
Ken
I have no idea where to catagorise this question please move it as you see fit.
My machine is mech mate, double steppers on rack & pinion on the Y(long)-axis & 1 motor for the X(gantry) & Z-axis.
All was well carving away for many months & I decided to re-surfact the spoil board.
I generated a g-code of pocketting a 2540x1340 area & reference the origin at -35,-35 using 2" end mill feed Z at 1.5mm & 9000mm/m.
All went well & suddenly the machine stopped & gave the following error message on AXIS on the lower right corner says:-
Joint 0 following error
I checked the hardware & nothing was jaming the rail of other mechanism, went throught the drivers to find loose connections, measured the voltages & motor temperature, all are well.
What could had went wrong? I'm now stranded with work progress...
Please help
Thanks in advance.
Ken
Last edit: 22 Nov 2010 08:50 by KenC.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- step4linux
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 115
- Thank you received: 5
22 Nov 2010 10:07 #5524
by step4linux
Replied by step4linux on topic Re:Emergency! join 0 following error
I guess you use stepper motors without any external feedback (encoder).
So its all internal in EMC.
See here for some possible causes in this case:
wiki.linuxcnc.org/emcinfo.pl?Following_Error
Have you ever used this speed ? Try to reduce speed as first attempt.
Gerd
So its all internal in EMC.
See here for some possible causes in this case:
wiki.linuxcnc.org/emcinfo.pl?Following_Error
Have you ever used this speed ? Try to reduce speed as first attempt.
Gerd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 Nov 2010 11:04 #5528
by KenC
Replied by KenC on topic Re:Emergency! join 0 following error
Thanks for the speedy response. YOU ARE A STAR!!!
Now I learn the purpose of min_ferror & max_error... the hard way...
I'm taking the safe path by finding by trial & error the highest speed (near) which I can run for now, it failed miserably at 8500mm/sec but it is holding up at 6500mm/sec. I'll finish off the resurfacing & stick to the highest speed possible speed until I get all my work off my back.
Will play with the min_ferror & max_ferror later.
Now I learn the purpose of min_ferror & max_error... the hard way...
I'm taking the safe path by finding by trial & error the highest speed (near) which I can run for now, it failed miserably at 8500mm/sec but it is holding up at 6500mm/sec. I'll finish off the resurfacing & stick to the highest speed possible speed until I get all my work off my back.
Will play with the min_ferror & max_ferror later.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- step4linux
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 115
- Thank you received: 5
22 Nov 2010 12:49 #5531
by step4linux
Replied by step4linux on topic Re:Emergency! join 0 following error
have a look also at BASE_PERIOD and run latency-test.
Maybe you can optimize it, to squeeze a bit more speed.
Gerd
Maybe you can optimize it, to squeeze a bit more speed.
Gerd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 Nov 2010 13:25 #5533
by KenC
Replied by KenC on topic Re:Emergency! join 0 following error
I derated the latency, as I use USB without hard disk, the PC sort of got hick up some time... I may use a regular P4 to replace my present ATOM MBobo.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 Nov 2010 21:20 #5545
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Re:Emergency! join 0 following error
KenC wrote:
A better (and cheaper) solution would be to abandon software step generation. A Mesa 7i43 will plug into the parallel port and give you smooth step rates up to megahertz, and then you don't even need a base thread, just the 1kHz servo thread. As a bonus you get 48 IO pins rather than 25.
I derated the latency, as I use USB without hard disk, the PC sort of got hick up some time... I may use a regular P4 to replace my present ATOM MBobo.
A better (and cheaper) solution would be to abandon software step generation. A Mesa 7i43 will plug into the parallel port and give you smooth step rates up to megahertz, and then you don't even need a base thread, just the 1kHz servo thread. As a bonus you get 48 IO pins rather than 25.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.064 seconds