Tool Touch With Prox?
- Todd Zuercher
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 5007
- Thank you received: 1462
17 Jun 2025 19:54 #330413
by Todd Zuercher
Tool Touch With Prox? was created by Todd Zuercher
I'm working at designing a small CNC machine for milling lock set mortises and would like to incorporate automatic tool length detection. I was wondering if a proximity switch could be used to accurately detect the tool tip. The tool would be spinning slowly in the spindle and lower into the prox's detection field from above the switch. The tool size, shape and material makeup should stay the same from one tool change to the next, so I shouldn't need to worry about a variety of different tools being detected differently by the sensor.
Thoughts and opinions? Think this could work consistently? Or would it be better to simply use a conductive pad with a lead connected to the tool or conventional normally closed switch.
Thoughts and opinions? Think this could work consistently? Or would it be better to simply use a conductive pad with a lead connected to the tool or conventional normally closed switch.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 20368
- Thank you received: 6922
17 Jun 2025 22:46 #330419
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Tool Touch With Prox?
Short version = No.
Long version, they do drift a lot with temp changes, material type, and material size = in this case very important.
I would venture a guess that optical sensors would be much better, or combination of the two.
The combination would be to use the proximity one for fast approach while the optical would do the slow precision part. Also could be used as a safety, say if the prox is active and Z moves over 3mm with no signal, stop and show an error ... like sensor is dirty... or tool is invisible
Long version, they do drift a lot with temp changes, material type, and material size = in this case very important.
I would venture a guess that optical sensors would be much better, or combination of the two.
The combination would be to use the proximity one for fast approach while the optical would do the slow precision part. Also could be used as a safety, say if the prox is active and Z moves over 3mm with no signal, stop and show an error ... like sensor is dirty... or tool is invisible

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.093 seconds