- LinuxCNC
- General LinuxCNC Questions
- Would you use a feed rate for rotary axes in mm/min (surface speed)?
Would you use a feed rate for rotary axes in mm/min (surface speed)?
- spumco
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2173
- Thank you received: 899
01 Oct 2026 21:30 #350055
by spumco
"G93 is fine for me" means
Inverse-time feedrate generated by CAM is sufficient for my needs.
The OP indicated a simple response would be sufficient. I gave one of the requested responses.
If your provocative post was not directed at me, disregard.
And, as usual, thank you grandixximo for all the work on LCNC.
Replied by spumco on topic Would you use a feed rate for rotary axes in mm/min (surface speed)?
"G93 is fine for me" means nothing.
"G93 is fine for me" means
Inverse-time feedrate generated by CAM is sufficient for my needs.
The OP indicated a simple response would be sufficient. I gave one of the requested responses.
If your provocative post was not directed at me, disregard.
And, as usual, thank you grandixximo for all the work on LCNC.
The following user(s) said Thank You: grandixximo, tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- djdelorie
- Away
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 85
- Thank you received: 17
01 Oct 2026 23:31 #350058
by djdelorie
Also, my third option gave the machine the math it needed to calculate the correct speeds.
Replied by djdelorie on topic Would you use a feed rate for rotary axes in mm/min (surface speed)?
Sure, but as I noted, sometimes I forget to use G93 and happen to include an A move in something innocuous, and it would be nice if the resulting motion was at least within an order of magnitude of correct instead of the default of stupidly slow.These are mathematical heresies
Also, my third option gave the machine the math it needed to calculate the correct speeds.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LinuxCNC
- General LinuxCNC Questions
- Would you use a feed rate for rotary axes in mm/min (surface speed)?
Time to create page: 0.317 seconds