RTAPI error and realtime delay at EMC launch

Some more progress, some more information. I'm taking the time to post this so maybe it will help someone else some day.

I remembered why I didn't use the Dell...no onboard parallel port. The addon card I had was not recognized by Ubuntu 10.04 and I could not find drivers for it.

Next up was the HP P4 I mentioned in my last post. HP a1320y, as I recall, P4 D 3Ghz, 1.5 GB RAM. What a colossal failure. First, the system hung on bootup (POST, not Ubuntu) with my kick-butt Gigabyte video card. Hmm, okay, back to the factory onboard card. I had a SATA drive in the system. Loaded the Live CD with U10.04. Latency from HELL. Servo thread was showing numbers in the 600,000 range and up almost immediately whether I ran the test immediately after bootup or half an hour after bootup. Actually doing things like opening Firefox and moving windows on screen gave me over 700,000 for servo thread and, regardless of usage, I got over 300,000 for base thread. Attempting to disable SMI (System Management Interrupt or whatever) did not work. F* F* F*

Hmm. Okay, I was using the same HD from the other problem-child I'd originally posted about. I grabbed a EIDE WD 40GB 7200 RPM disk I had laying around and tried that. It was magical. My servo thread jumped to over 1,000,000...with some results over 2,000,000 and higher base thread numbers, too. Not a happy camper.

I read about the SMI problem and about it being included with some Intel chipsets. So, I decided, fine, I'll give Ubuntu and old PC and see what happens (maybe an older system wouldn't have the SMI on it).

I have a system that is about 8 years old I guess. P4 1.8 Ghz, single core. I had tried to mix-n-match RAM and had 1.75 (roughly) GB installed...1GB stick, 512MB stick, and a 256MB stick but that didn't work, the system only saw the 768MB. No biggie. Latency tests showed < 35,000 for the servo thread...even though it's running on a litter-mate WD 40 GB 7,200 RPM drive and on the onboard video. I shut the system down and removed the 512 and 256MB sticks and the system then used the 1GB stick. Latency times dropped a little more (maybe because the 1GB stick is PC3200 IIRC and the 768 combined sticks were PC133). Now running the test for 10 minutes+ showing servo thread latency of 32,405. MUCH improved over the HP with the dual core P4 and 1.5 GB RAM with a SATA drive (or the EIDE drive). Go figure that one out. :blink:

The motherboard in this old system is an ASUS P4S533-MX.

Latency on this system is: Servo 99,308 and Base 32,405.

EMC2 loads with no errors about latency or RTAI and Axis runs/loads fine.

So, I'm wondering...if the SMI stuff is only prevalent on Intel chipsets (and maybe I'm being ignorant of chipset manufacturers here), why couldn't I (we) try using a system based on an AMD processor? Do they use Intel chipsets? Sorry, lonnnnng time, no hardware monkeying.

I am considering just buying one of the Intel D510MO that BigJohnT has had good luck with. This stuff with Ubuntu/EMC2 was supposed to help me with a grassroots approach to CNC but it's being a pain with the hardware problems I've had.

Thanks to those who have helped me. I hope this will give a little back.

--HC

A little more about this system's performance.

I left the Latency Test running all night. Last night I kicked off the install for Open Office suite. This morning I let Update Manager download and install about 215 updates for a total of about 173 MB. While that downloaded and installed I searched for computer parts (for a new Linux box and a replacement hard drive for one of my laptops).

I went to amazon com, newgg com, walmart com, intel com, and some result sites I found with google com. I had as many as 6 browser (Firefox) windows open, some with multiple tabs, all while the downloading and installing was running. They system is fun-fast to use, but it's usable. However, the Servo thread reports 74,000 at this time for the max and Base thread reports just under 35,000. Up until a few minutes ago they were both under 20k. I suspect that the jump came when the updates finished and Firefox notified me that it needs to be restarted.

Much better than the P4 dual core HP a1320y I had up on the desk before with 1M+ for Servo and comparatively high Base thread.

I ordered:

Intel D510MO motherboard N82E16813121399
Crucial 4 GB memory kit N82E16820148160
Western Digital Caviar *black* N82E16822136320
Rosewill 500W power supply N82E16817182076
Rosewill case N82E16811147023
HP external DVD/CD ROM N82E16827140077

I have a few internal DVD/CD drives around but elected to buy an external with the hopes I can use it to reload the OS on my Dell Mini 9 which has no optical drive. I also already have the header connector for the parallel port so I didn't need to order one of those.

Total came to $338.64 including UPS 3 day shipping to north central Texas.

I'll build it when it arrives and post my results.

--HC

Just FYI
Setups on D510MO boars are happy with 65W power supplies -- board is eating ~20-25W
So 500W supply is overkill

I am running with a 20W PicoPSU and using a 4GB DOM SATA solid state drive. No moving parts at all.

Well, I like to go big or stay home. And the extra power will help with the flux-core capacitor I'm developing for my CNC plasma table. <GRIN>

Honestly, I didn't even consider the power consumption of the board or other components when I ordered the PS; I just wanted something that worked, having the necessary connectors for a modern motherboard (compared to my antiquated PS's from old systems). I'm now running on that system (just assembled it this evening and this is my first boot since load about 20 minutes ago). I would agree that the PS is overkill in at least the fact that it has no less than 6 power connectors I'm not using (about 5 SATA IIRC and a couple of four-pin connectors for PCI-E and maybe a couple others). But it's working...and I suppose that if the devices aren't pulling the current then the wall-draw should be less than the max the PS is rated to put out/pull.

My major concern with selecting a PS was simply that I wanted it to fit into the case I bought and I wasn't sure what different standards were at play these days (it's been 10 years now since I built a computer from scratch, having switched to just buying Dell or HP computers).

I'm off to write up my findings on the new system (trying to help others who might come along and read this).



--HC

What happened to when guys bragged about how big and powerful things were? :laugh: