Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4
- nobby42
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 9
- Thank you received: 0
14 Mar 2025 13:48 - 14 Mar 2025 13:49 #323925
by nobby42
Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4 was created by nobby42
Hallo,
ich habe mich entschlossen meine Systeme mal auf neuen Stand zu bringen. Ich habe dazu LinuxCNC 2.9.4 parallel installiert und möchte nun die Konfiguration erstellen. Die alte Konfiguration von der Version 2.8.4 (mit gmoccapy und einigen Macros und WHB04B-4andrad ) funktioniert so natürlich nicht. Was kann ich von der alten Konfiguration weiter verwenden, was muss ich anpassen und was muss neu erstellt werden?
Danke für eure Hilfe.
Norbert
ich habe mich entschlossen meine Systeme mal auf neuen Stand zu bringen. Ich habe dazu LinuxCNC 2.9.4 parallel installiert und möchte nun die Konfiguration erstellen. Die alte Konfiguration von der Version 2.8.4 (mit gmoccapy und einigen Macros und WHB04B-4andrad ) funktioniert so natürlich nicht. Was kann ich von der alten Konfiguration weiter verwenden, was muss ich anpassen und was muss neu erstellt werden?
Danke für eure Hilfe.
Norbert
Last edit: 14 Mar 2025 13:49 by nobby42.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- langdons
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 7
17 Mar 2025 12:33 #324108
by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- langdons
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 7
17 Mar 2025 12:35 #324109
by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4
Old versions still work.
Don't change stuff unless you really need to.
If it works, don't mess with it.
(With software at least)
Don't change stuff unless you really need to.
If it works, don't mess with it.
(With software at least)
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight, Tchefter
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 19874
- Thank you received: 6728
17 Mar 2025 16:24 #324128
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4
I absolutely agree.If it works, don't mess with it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- nobby42
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 9
- Thank you received: 0
17 Mar 2025 19:48 #324144
by nobby42
Replied by nobby42 on topic Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4
I am still working with version 2.8.4. I wanted to test what version 2.9.4 can do better and installed it in parallel.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 19874
- Thank you received: 6728
17 Mar 2025 19:54 #324145
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4
You can test everything, even run machines, without installing LinuxCNC, just boot from USB in Live mode and run the sim configurations included, or use another USB or the internal HDD if you want to actually run the machine, again without installing anything.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- langdons
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 7
18 Mar 2025 13:34 #324199
by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4
Before you change stuff, look at the changelog to see what features were added since 2.8.4.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- langdons
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 7
18 Mar 2025 13:40 #324200
by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4
Your software is only 2.5 years old.
Where I live, Ontario Canada, most stores are using Windows 95-XP for their POS computer.
Most stuff is running Java 7 or 8, or sometimes lower.
Everything is immensely outdated!
Running 2.8.4 instead of 2.9.4 is insignificant in comparison!
Where I live, Ontario Canada, most stores are using Windows 95-XP for their POS computer.
Most stuff is running Java 7 or 8, or sometimes lower.
Everything is immensely outdated!
Running 2.8.4 instead of 2.9.4 is insignificant in comparison!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aciera
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4238
- Thank you received: 1867
18 Mar 2025 13:48 #324202
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4
Um zurück zur Frage zu kommen würde ich wie schon erwähnt mal probeweise die neue Version auf eine zweite festplatte installieren und deine jetzige Konfiguration mal laden dann kann man auch gleich auf konkrete Fehlermeldungen eingehen.Was kann ich von der alten Konfiguration weiter verwenden, was muss ich anpassen und was muss neu erstellt werden?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- langdons
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 7
18 Mar 2025 14:00 - 18 Mar 2025 14:03 #324203
by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Migration von 2.8.4 auf 2.9.4
Newer versions are not always better.
Newer Java versions are generally always superior and usually come with no real drawback.
However, not everything is like that.
I hate everything about Windows 11, I think it's ugly, unintuitive, annoying, and the GUI is a bad rip-off of GNOME and macOS.
Oftentimes, new versions bring good things and bad things.
The improvements, reduced familiarity, and regressions often almost cancel out.
For example, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS is not immensely better than Ubuntu 22.04 LTS; upgrading is not worth it.
Newer Java versions are generally always superior and usually come with no real drawback.
However, not everything is like that.
I hate everything about Windows 11, I think it's ugly, unintuitive, annoying, and the GUI is a bad rip-off of GNOME and macOS.
Oftentimes, new versions bring good things and bad things.
The improvements, reduced familiarity, and regressions often almost cancel out.
For example, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS is not immensely better than Ubuntu 22.04 LTS; upgrading is not worth it.
Last edit: 18 Mar 2025 14:03 by langdons. Reason: Fixed typo, fixed grammar.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.079 seconds