Joint following error

More
02 Nov 2020 17:16 #188125 by Jocman
Joint following error was created by Jocman
Hi all.
I started a drilling job (about 70 holes) but after about 20 minutes (15 holes) the machine stopped with 2 error messages:

- hm2/hm2_7i76e.0:error finishing read!
- joint 0 following error

I suppose is something related to ini or hal files, but honestly don't know ho to fix it (and more understand why it happens).

Thanks

Andrea
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Nov 2020 18:07 #188130 by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Joint following error

hm2/hm2_7i76e.0:error finishing read!


Means that you have lost contact with the 7I76E
This may be an electrical issue or a problem with latency on the host PC

What do you get for times if you ping the 7I76E?

What Host hardware do you have?

What OS are you running (uname -a)?
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jocman

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Nov 2020 20:45 #188151 by Jocman
Replied by Jocman on topic Joint following error
Ping results:
23 packages
Avg 0.069ms
Min 0.049ms
Max 0.113ms
0% loss

Hdware:
Asrock Q1900M
Intel celeron J1900 1.99Ghz
RAM 8Gb
Onboard lan port (for mesa) + additional lan port (web)

OS:
4.9.0-8-rt-amd64 #1 smp preempt rt debian 4.9.110-3+deb9u6 (2018-10-08) x86_64 GNU/LINUX

I run a latency test while retrieving the os data,getting this:
Max jitter 82864 (servo thread) - 62588 (base thread)
Running 10 instances of glxgears (and terminal windows):
82864 (servo thread) - 1555650 (base thread)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Nov 2020 01:50 #188168 by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Joint following error
Are all power management/Turbo modes/Cstates > C1 disabled in BIOS?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Nov 2020 08:29 #188190 by Jocman
Replied by Jocman on topic Joint following error
Sorry for late reply (time difference with the "old world").
Currently I'm at workplace, but as far as I remember everything is disabled (that's why when I installed the mesa board I got a good increase, or better a "decrease", of latency).
BTW, as soon as I'll back home in the late afternoon (about 8 hrs) I'll check the bios settings too.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Nov 2020 16:32 #188244 by Jocman
Replied by Jocman on topic Joint following error
Well, I checked the bios settings.
This is a resume of some various settings:

- Intel Speedstep Technology (Disabled)
- CPU Cstates support (Disabled)
- Enhanced Halt State (C1E) (Disabled)
- No execute memory protection (Disabled)
- Intel virtualization technology (Disabled)
- IGPU multimonitor (Disabled)
- Onboard HD audio (Disabled)
- Deep S5 (Disabled)
- Sata aggressive link power management (Disabled)
- Hard Disk S.M.A.R.T. (Disabled)
- Intel smart connect technology (Disabled)
- Suspend to RAM (Auto)
- ACPI HPET Table (Enabled)
- PS2 Keyboard Power on (Disabled)
- PCIE Device Power on (Disabled)
- Ring-in Power on (Disabled)
- RTC Alarm Power on (Disabled)
- USB keyboard/remote Power on (Disabled)
- USB mouse Power on (Disabled)
- USB controller (Enabled)
- Intel USB 3.0 Mode (Auto)
- Legacy USB Support (Enabled)

I think everything unnecessary is disabled.....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Nov 2020 18:25 #188246 by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Joint following error

Running 10 instances of glxgears (and terminal windows):
82864 (servo thread) - 1555650 (base thread)


This indicates a major latency issue but a better test would be to run
without a base thread:

latency-test 1ms 1ms
or
latency-histogram --nobase --sbinsize 1000

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Nov 2020 08:13 #188296 by Jocman
Replied by Jocman on topic Joint following error
I'll try this one too and let you know.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Nov 2020 16:41 #188321 by Jocman
Replied by Jocman on topic Joint following error
I tried both commands

The first gave me a Max Jitter of 22845; then when I started the browser to write this post, the value raised up to 168149 (no glxgears instances)

The second command (with 10 instances of glxgears): 1st test without browser, 2nd test with browser, 3rd test only browser (no glxgears instances)
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Nov 2020 11:59 #188493 by Jocman
Replied by Jocman on topic Joint following error
Reading some posts in the forum about people with the same issue, I red the solution gaven to fix it: the parameter FERROR in the INI file.
In particular, to set this value as 1 (not higher).
I tried to set my values to 1 (they were 10), then started a .... fake job (spindle off and no bit). Everything was fine, so I risked to start a complete job.
The machine accomplished the task, without any issue.

My doubt: this was the solution to my problem or just a lucky strike / coincidence?

Reading the FERROR documentation, as I understood (?) it concerns the axis position control for open loop systems. My is a closed loop one. Does it matter?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.087 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum