- Posts: 42
- Thank you received: 5
best practice for creating a "digital twin" - simulation version of a real machi
- piflixe
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
3 years 10 months ago #260584
by piflixe
Replied by piflixe on topic best practice for creating a "digital twin" - simulation version of a real machi
just for reference to other users who might encounter the same issue: attached you find the modified simulated_home.hal . I kindly ask to change the file on github as well or at least add the comments to make it more human-readable.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JT
- Away
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1107
- Thank you received: 599
3 years 10 months ago #260591
by JT
Replied by JT on topic best practice for creating a "digital twin" - simulation version of a real machi
You can do a pull request and get credit for the added information.
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pulls
JT
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pulls
JT
The following user(s) said Thank You: piflixe
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- piflixe
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 42
- Thank you received: 5
3 years 9 months ago - 3 years 9 months ago #260757
by piflixe
Replied by piflixe on topic best practice for creating a "digital twin" - simulation version of a real machi
Thanks for the remark. That's what I did:
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/2236
- still a git novice but always keen on learning new git functions.
Last edit: 3 years 9 months ago by piflixe. Reason: added link to pull request
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.268 seconds