Advanced Search

Already answered in another thread...

Unless you have a 7I76, some way to connect to it (which that card does not provide),
and 7I76 compatible firmware installed. you cannot use that configuration.

You should be able to get closer with a G540X2 configuration in pncconf or
using pncconfs "Discover" option.
 

@rodw

You have already been asked not to link to products behind your paywall. If you cannot help people here without pushing your business then please find another way to do so.

... It wouldn't take much to change every "plunge" in this g-code program into a "leap" for use on a 3d printer to make floors walls and lids for oddly shaped boxes.  I suspect that some 3d printers already do something like this so now all we need to do is figure out how to get g-code to produce annotated drawings (instead of parts themselves) so we can sell the products to our waiting customers?... 

I am having a problem configuring the 7I92 card that I bought on AliExpress.
From what I understand, it's a cloned card. My problem occurs when I configure the P1 and 7i76-Analog Output tabs, the error appears as shown in the last photo. 
However, when I only configure the P2 tab, nothing happens; the card works and the EasyServo devices operate.
Now I need to configure other outputs to make the motor or spindle work, but this error occurs.
Has anyone else experienced a similar problem?
 

Hello, 
I am having a problem configuring the 7I92 card that I bought on AliExpress.
From what I understand, it's a cloned card. My problem occurs when I configure the P1 and 7i76-Analog Output tabs, the error appears as shown in the last photo. 
However, when I only configure the P2 tab, nothing happens; the card works and the EasyServo devices operate.
Now I need to configure other outputs to make the motor or spindle work, but this error occurs.
Has anyone else experienced a similar problem?
I'm leaving the link to where I bought it.
aliexpress.com/item/1005010164851154.html?spm=a2g0o.order_list.order_list_main.50.12fecaa4j6tb61&gatewayAdapt=glo2bra

I fully understand, I even tried to hook up a 32 inch external monitor without touch function, however it gives the image from rpi4 via mini hdmi, and regardless of the resolution of the large screen the numbers on the preview tab are still quite blurry, yes it would mean that we try. thanks

We can enlarge those fonts but I think we are compressing too much info on such a small display
I have done a Aus where the touch screen was for control and a separate monitor like an old 15” was used for preview only
Ie dual screen one touch one display

So can do if u interested

Yes, that is spam.

Was ist denn kaputt?

Um da irgendwie weiter zu kommen im Forum wären mehr Infos über die "verdächtige" Karte hilfreich.

Vielleicht hat ja jemand einen Alternativvorschlag, wenn die Hardware bekannt ist. Oder eine Möglichkeit weitere Tips zur Fehlersuche zu geben.

Die Endschalter kann man irgendwo in hal und ini außer Kraft setzen. Ich habe z.b. Die a-Achse ohne Referenzschalter.

 

So ein Ding? Da kann man mit Sicherheit eine Alternative finden, die vertretbar ist.

Das wird nicht billig, aber auch nicht unerschwinglich teuer. Ich schätze ein China Break out board (20€) und drei getrennte preiswerte Motor-endstufen (10€ - 30€) pro Stück. 

Viel Erfolg!  



 

I will read through that once again. Thank you.

Is there any way to split a job into multiple files, not including the "designate one directory as a working job directory for everything" ?  I want to keep each job's files in separate directories, but linuxcnc doesn't seem to look in the same directory as the calling file, for subroutine files.
I really just need to do a series of G92 (or G10L2 etc), run file A, G92, run file B, etc.
 

Is anyone running AllwinCNC on a working machine?

This looks and smells like spam so i'll be watching.

I have been running my small hobby CNC router on a older Windows based controller setup for about three years and the decision to finally move to LinuxCNC has been sitting on my to do list for longer than I care to admit. Last month I committed to making the switch and what I assumed would be a straightforward hardware selection process has turned into a surprisingly deep rabbit hole.The core challenge is that LinuxCNC is uniquely sensitive to hardware in ways that most Linux installations simply are not. Latency performance from the hardware directly affects how cleanly the software can generate step pulses and a machine that runs Linux perfectly for general use can produce completely unacceptable latency numbers for CNC control work. I learned this the hard way after pulling an old Core i5 desktop from storage that I assumed would be more than adequate and running the latency test only to get numbers that would cause real issues at the feed rates I want to run.Motherboard and CPU combination selection seems to matter enormously with certain chipsets producing dramatically better latency results than others and the documentation around which specific hardware combinations are known good versus problematic is scattered across forum threads spanning years with no single consolidated reference that feels current.I have also been going back and forth on whether a parallel port based setup or a Mesa FPGA card approach makes more sense for my specific machine. The Mesa route offloads the timing critical work to dedicated hardware which should make the host PC hardware selection less critical but adds cost and complexity I was hoping to avoid initially.Been sourcing and comparing compatible hardware options through www.amazon.com/ and found some information about the performace of different components and found these components on reasonable price at Link removed alongside a few other places and the pricing on suitable older Intel platforms that the LinuxCNC community tends to recommend has been reasonable enough to make dedicated controller hardware financially sensible rather than repurposing whatever is available.Has anyone recently gone through hardware selection for a LinuxCNC build and found specific motherboard and CPU combinations that consistently pass the latency test without extensive tuning?