Advanced Search

I figured out the problem. The spindle at speed wasn't going true for the clockwise direction of the spindle causing the code to hang.

I have been experimenting with planner type 1 for a while now with 3-axis milling machine. Generally it seems to work but I'm having problems with g33.1. What is the current state with tp1, should it work when running g33.1? Right now I get error "ruckig_plan_position: invalid limits (v=0.000000, a=3000.000000, j=120000.000000)" at every spindle revolution. In ini file I have nonzero traj(default_linear_velocity, max_linear_velocity), axis' and joints(max_velocity).

The instructions to install ethercat are here:
forum.linuxcnc.org/ethercat/45336-etherc...-how-to-step-by-step

We use an xml file to define PDOs and map to linuxcnc pins but its nothing like twincat stuff.

I've been working on a custom ISO that installs ethercat and tunes the kernel but its slow going.

grandixximo wrote:

With ec_igb or ec_igc native driver: interrupt moderation is irrelevant, they use polling not interrupt.
With ec_generic: interrupt moderation is active and you should disable it with

ethtool -C <iface> adaptive-rx off rx-usecs 0 tx-usecs 0

probably as soon as possible on boot, before ethercat starts.
To know which drive you are using, check your erhercat.conf file

You can use a udev rule to do this. we use one for ethercat to use as an example. You might be able to extend the ethercat script  to add ethtool commands for: 
<iface> gro off lro off tso off
-set-eee <iface> eee off
 

Could you please provide the error logs?

ah thanks I uncommented that out. No change to the behavior though.
 

pid.s.index-enable is still commented out in the last file you attached.

ich arbeite aktuell mit einem externen Touchscreen-Monitor, der an ein Ubuntu-System angeschlossen ist. Es handelt sich dabei um ein Setup, das eher für industrielle Anwendungen gedacht ist (ähnlich wie ein Panel PC / Kiosk-System).

Das Problem ist, dass der Touch zwar erkannt wird, aber die Eingabe nicht ganz präzise ist bzw. teilweise verzögert reagiert. Ich habe bereits versucht, einige Einstellungen zu prüfen, aber bisher ohne Erfolg.

Hat jemand Erfahrung mit der Kalibrierung von Touchscreens unter Ubuntu oder kennt mögliche Lösungen (Treiber, Tools etc.)?

Ich habe auch einige industrielle Touchscreen-Lösungen gesehen, die speziell für solche Anwendungsfälle optimiert sind, z. B. hier:
baobaotechnology.com/our-products/touchscreen-computers/

Vielleicht hat jemand ähnliche Hardware im Einsatz und kann Tipps geben.

Vielen Dank im Voraus!

Okay, I cleaned it up and made sure a signal spindle-index-enable was connected. We still get to the G33.1 line and it sits there and doesnt move in the z axis.

Sorry, let me clean that up a bit.
 

I'm currently working on the Probe_basic version. In the Handrad.hal and probe_basic_postgui.hal files, there are two lines that are causing problems. I’ll just copy the relevant parts here:

handrad.hal
net pdnt.program.is-idle whb.halui.program.is-idle halui.program.is-idle
net pdnt.program.is-paused whb.halui.program.is-paused halui.program.is-paused

and

postgui
#net prog-running not.0.in <= halui.program.is-idle
#net prog-paused halui.program.is-paused => time.0.pause
net cycle-timer time.0.start <= not.0.out
net cycle-seconds qtpyvcp.timerseconds.in <= time.0.seconds
net cycle-minutes qtpyvcp.timerminutes.in <= time.0.minutes
net cycle-hours qtpyvcp.timerhours.in <= time.0.hours
# *** Time items required for Probe Basic to run ***

As far as I understand, program.is-idle starts and “resets” a timer, and program.is-paused pauses the timer. 

I _will_ try to do the feedbback test again as I think I only connected the stepgen fb to joint fb, not pid fb aswell.

The drive is at 10000 PPR and around 1.45:1 spindle:motor overdrive, from my calculations 6k rpm spindle speed is around the limit. there is a 2500 step/10k line encoder on the spindle itself I use for feedback.

I am looking through the HAL again and wondering maybe I DO have the scaling wrong? Though the positions and speeds report correct, maybe the scales are backwards, the end math turns out correct, but calculations midway are off? I'm trying to think of anything now, really.

• -ENCODER_SCALE is 10000
• -Spindle SCALE is 114.83 (10000/1.45/60) (not sure why it needs to be divided by 60 though? I assume because RPS instead of RPM, but I thought this value should not be bound by time, only steps/rev? I'm not sure...
• -JOINT_2 (C axis in my case) SCALE is 19.07 (10000/1.45/360). I turned on the scale switching in M102/103, not sure how you get it to work without that?

What makes me think that I have something off is the scaling by 360 of the enc-pos signal in the HAL. As in I have 10000 lines per rev, so multiplying it by 360 instead of dividing makes no sense to me the way I have it now. 

Yeah that’s the one

Hi everyone,I’m very new to LinuxCNC and Mesa boards, so I might be missing something basic here, but I’ve been stuck on this for a while and could really use some guidance.I’m working with a Mesa 7I76EU and setting up stepgens in LinuxCNC. When I use TB3 (channel 4), everything works perfectly. The motor moves in both directions, the direction signal changes correctly, and I can clearly see step pulses on the oscilloscope.The issue is with TB2 (channels 0–3). No matter which channel I use, I don’t get proper behavior. At first, measuring to ground made it seem like there was no voltage at all, which confused me. Then I realized these are differential outputs and started measuring across the pairs instead.On TB2, I can see step pulses across STEP+ and STEP− (about 5V differential), so the channel is definitely active. But the DIR signal (DIR+ to DIR−) stays constant at about 5V and does not change when I reverse direction. Also, the step pulses only show up when jogging in one direction, not both.In HALShow, the stepgen for that channel looks active. Enable is true, velocity command changes sign when I jog forward and backward, and position feedback and counts are updating. So from LinuxCNC’s side, it looks like the commands are being generated correctlyWhat’s confusing me is that TB3 works perfectly under the same setup, but TB2 behaves like this. At this point I’m not sure if this is something I’m misunderstanding about configuration or differential signals, or if it could be a partial hardware issue affecting only TB2.Has anyone run into something like this before? Any suggestions on what I should check next would really help.Thanks a lot

There was a problem with the limits and the estop on the input pins. I got that all figured out and now the machine is working and homing. I just now have to get it all tuned up. Thanks again for all your help.