- Posts: 5712
- Thank you received: 0
Another plasma component...
That is very nice, it looks good in a sim.docwelch wrote: Phill,
As you know, I've had to do quite a bit of work to get the Fusion 360 post processor working with PlasmaC. I've really worked on the small hole cutting more than anything. I have now managed to get the post processor to create a lead-in arc from the center of a hole similar to what Hypertherm recommends. I think, based on the plasmac_gcode_arcs.py file you posted in the past, that you could accomplish this same thing (i.e. you have the variables needed for the calculations). If you want to put this into plasmac, I'll share with you the way that I did it.
I am not sure how much more to add to the PlasmaC preprocessor, most of these features probably do belong in a CAM postprocessor although they are nice to have for users who either don't have CAM or a postprocesser with that ability and I do like what you did.
In the meantime while I procrastinate, now that PlasmaC has its own section in the forum it may be worthwhile if I make a sticky locked thread that has user donated postprocessors.
Edit: A question for Tom, if someone posts in the PlasmaC section can I move that post to a sticky thread?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 22010
- Thank you received: 3
Never tried it, but it should work.phillc54 wrote: Edit: A question for Tom, if someone posts in the PlasmaC section can I move that post to a sticky thread?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I have to say I can't wait to experiment with this new feature because my current spotting process is to wait until I get an ArcOK. I think this is pretty brutal by comparison!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
JTknives wrote: How are you marking holes? I just use the drill function in sheet cam and have zero delay. It does a super fast pulse and makes a mark that looks almost identical to a center punch mark. Here is s video showing it in action. I think where I might be different is I have a very low arc OK voltage set.
Probably where we differ is that we are relying on the machine to give us an ArcOK and you are synthesising yours as your machine does not have a CNC interface.
Currently, for spotting I turn the torch off as soon as it sees an ArcOK but that is enough to pierce 2mm steel at 40 amps. It is more brutal at 120 amps on 16mm.
How this came about is I had a bug in my new ohmic sensing component and a probe signal was left enabled which Linuxcnc sees as an error. I suspect the torch was turned off on the next servo cycle.
I've been working on a new Ohmic sensing method which uses a Mesa THCAD-5 kindly donated by PCW to sense the voltage in the 24 volt circuit for the probe signal. The higher isolation afforded by the THCAD means there is no need to add relays and diodes to the circuit to protect things. In fact, its perfectly safe to leave the power supply connected all of the time but I've added an AC relay (blue one) to power off the power supply when not in use more to protect against any consumable corrosion that might occur on a water table.
Attachment not found
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Plus one for voltage derived Arc OKJTknives wrote: How are you marking holes? I just use the drill function in sheet cam and have zero delay. It does a super fast pulse and makes a mark that looks almost identical to a center punch mark. Here is s video showing it in action. I think where I might be different is I have a very low arc OK voltage set.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- thefabricator03
- New Member
-
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
What could be wrong?
The ARK-OK signal arrives. I still use the external THC from Proma.
I use installation from the LinuxCNC buildbot.
Thanks.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
F99999 (high feed rate)
g0 x10 y10
m3 $2 s1 (centre Spot on)
g91 (relative distance mode)
g1 x0.000001
g90 (absolute distance mode)
m5 (centre punch off)
g0 x0 y0
g90
m30
And tried other GCodes, the result is the same.
How should this function work, the plasmac should wait for the arcOK?
It seems like the plasmac does not see the signal of the arcOK and repeats attempts many times.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
