- Posts: 48
- Thank you received: 1
New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
- guymalpass
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
9 years 10 months ago #84059
by guymalpass
Replied by guymalpass on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- guymalpass
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 48
- Thank you received: 1
9 years 10 months ago #84060
by guymalpass
Replied by guymalpass on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
The error occurs between N0330 and N0340 in the ngc file
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- skunkworks
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 351
- Thank you received: 153
9 years 10 months ago #84211
by skunkworks
Replied by skunkworks on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
I used your ini and my sim hal files (that have acc/vel calculated) and am not seeing any violation.
Couple of things.
-have you done a mem check?
-are you getting any realtime delays?
-could you have sticktion or something going on at that point to cause a following error?
-How is your tuning?
I could see the following error happening first - then the axis costing down creating the line as if it wasn't following the circle.
Couple of things.
-have you done a mem check?
-are you getting any realtime delays?
-could you have sticktion or something going on at that point to cause a following error?
-How is your tuning?
I could see the following error happening first - then the axis costing down creating the line as if it wasn't following the circle.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- skunkworks
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 351
- Thank you received: 153
9 years 10 months ago #84212
by skunkworks
Replied by skunkworks on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
A few more things? What version of linuxcnc did you come from? was it 2.6? This would somewhat make sense that putting the trajectory planner ARC_BLEND_ENABLE to false puts it back to 2.6 - 1 segment look ahead. The new TP uses all your acceleration available compared to the previous (2.6 and older) TP which would use only half the available acceleration. (for blended moves) This would then point even more towards a tuning issue.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- guymalpass
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 48
- Thank you received: 1
9 years 10 months ago #84214
by guymalpass
Could you please elaborate on this
Does that mean you saw the same problem?
Cheers
Replied by guymalpass on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
- No I haven't done a memcheck
- No realtime delays
- I got the same problem with the motors mechanically disconnected
- I think my tuning is good, have been running this tune for a year and this machine sees a lot of work
- I came from JA9 which was based on 2.8, since my original post I reverted back but still get the same error. This leads me to believe linuxcnc just doesn't like that bit of gcode so I edited it and now seems ok.
Could you please elaborate on this
?I could see the following error happening first - then the axis costing down creating the line as if it wasn't following the circle
Does that mean you saw the same problem?
Cheers
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- skunkworks
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 351
- Thank you received: 153
9 years 10 months ago #84217
by skunkworks
Replied by skunkworks on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 1.189 seconds