X-carve linux cnc upgrade tuning
so the pulse is every time the count increments.
That's the stepper stepping. The only way to reduce that is in the hardware, specifically by increasing the microstep ratio.
(You need to tell LinuxCNC that you have done that, either by manually editing SCALE or changing the settings in the config wizard.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
so the pulse is every time the count increments.
That's the stepper stepping. The only way to reduce that is in the hardware, specifically by increasing the microstep ratio.
(You need to tell LinuxCNC that you have done that, either by manually editing SCALE or changing the settings in the config wizard.
My microstep setting is at 8 what do you recommend
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
My microstep setting is at 8 what do you recommend
How far does the machine move with every step?
I think that you might just have to accept that that is how the machine is with very slow moves.
Look in the sample G-code for daisy.ngc.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
i got that number from the hal that you told me about.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Does the lurch frequency you hear correlate with the feed-rate at that number?
It appears to. This behavior is in stsrk contrast to the arduino solution I'm coming from which its why I'm so alarmed by it. And also why I'm assuming it can be fixed or solved.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
it is just about possible that there is a wiring problem, Sending steps to direction and direction to step might, actually, work, but confuse the driver badly.
Similarly, stepping on the "enable" line can work too.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
i understand i'm using more amps now and this is an entirely different beast by comparison.
Did you also upgrade the motors? Are your amps settings appropriate for the motors? Have you tried reducing amps?
You could try 16 micro steps.
It is interesting that the second review of the drivers complains of jerky movement.
Rick G
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
i understand i'm using more amps now and this is an entirely different beast by comparison.
Did you also upgrade the motors? Are your amps settings appropriate for the motors? Have you tried reducing amps?
You could try 16 micro steps.
It is interesting that the second review of the drivers complains of jerky movement.
Rick G
perhaps i described it poorly. the movement is a start stop which causes a loud noise at ever step and makes the machine start and stop with each pulse or step.
i will try to increase the microsteps and reduce the amps tonight
also these are Nema 23's 4 wire i can't remember the weight but they are on the smaller size. my understanding is that they will hold the 3 amps but to your point the arduino never pushed anything near that powerful.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LearningLinuxCNC
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 320
- Thank you received: 48
I prefer to have my machines set up so that I get about 0.001" per step even if that means I need higher microstepping. In your case I would increase the gear ratio from the motors or the microstepping or both as required/applicable. I know that I don't actually get 0.001" resolution by increasing the microstepping but it does help with start stop jumps as you are describing.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.