×
Forum Header
Parallel Port Limit Switches
- probamo
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 139
- Thank you received: 9
15 Jul 2021 19:10 #214917
by probamo
Replied by probamo on topic Parallel Port Limit Switches
any help?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aciera
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4554
- Thank you received: 2028
15 Jul 2021 19:25 #214919
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic Parallel Port Limit Switches
Can you post your hal and ini files?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- probamo
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 139
- Thank you received: 9
15 Jul 2021 20:52 #214931
by probamo
Here they are.
Replied by probamo on topic Parallel Port Limit Switches
Here they are.
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 20851
- Thank you received: 7107
16 Jul 2021 00:29 #214958
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Parallel Port Limit Switches
Test the parallel port using the port tester without connecting it to anything, use a short piece of wire inserted in pins 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 and touch the port metal with the other side of the wire.
Check the GND wire for the limit switches if there is no BOB,
Check the GND and +5V for the BOB and limit switches if using a normal BOB,
Check the 5V and 12V if using a Mach3 BOB with the blue relay,
Check the GND wire for the limit switches if there is no BOB,
Check the GND and +5V for the BOB and limit switches if using a normal BOB,
Check the 5V and 12V if using a Mach3 BOB with the blue relay,
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- probamo
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 139
- Thank you received: 9
17 Jul 2021 07:57 #215122
by probamo
Replied by probamo on topic Parallel Port Limit Switches
Disconnected everything. When use parallel port tester 0x378 all red, no any feedback while testing with wire. Choosing 0x278, all green (except 11 - still red) no changing lights while testing with the wire?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- probamo
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 139
- Thank you received: 9
17 Jul 2021 09:02 #215126
by probamo
Replied by probamo on topic Parallel Port Limit Switches
In addition, checking 'dmesg | grep par, it is 0x378, irq5 (PCSPP) on board?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 19677
- Thank you received: 4554
24 Jul 2021 11:47 #215765
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Parallel Port Limit Switches
This is a bit strange.
If you load the parport from the command line is there any clue?
halrun
loadrt hal_parport config="0x378"
If you load the parport from the command line is there any clue?
halrun
loadrt hal_parport config="0x378"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- probamo
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 139
- Thank you received: 9
06 Aug 2021 19:03 #217070
by probamo
Replied by probamo on topic Parallel Port Limit Switches
dejan@debian:~$ halrun
halcmd: loadrt hal_parport config="0x378"
Note: Using POSIX realtime
Unknown parameter `config=0x378'
<stdin>:1: waitpid failed /usr/bin/rtapi_app hal_parport
<stdin>:1: /usr/bin/rtapi_app exited without becoming ready
<stdin>:1: insmod for hal_parport failed, returned -1
halcmd:
halcmd: loadrt hal_parport config="0x378"
Note: Using POSIX realtime
Unknown parameter `config=0x378'
<stdin>:1: waitpid failed /usr/bin/rtapi_app hal_parport
<stdin>:1: /usr/bin/rtapi_app exited without becoming ready
<stdin>:1: insmod for hal_parport failed, returned -1
halcmd:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 20851
- Thank you received: 7107
06 Aug 2021 23:08 #217090
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Parallel Port Limit Switches
loadrt hal_parport cfg="0x378 out"Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.201 seconds