I posted these results because I think they're poor results and the script bailed early because of an unacceptable delay? This is a laptop which I know is usually a bad choice for linuxcnc.
BUT...I've been using this setup for years with no issues whatsoever. Is it because I'm using a Mesa 7i76e over ethernet so the pc's latency doesn't really matter?
LinuxCNC pc tests, version 20200624, started 08.03.2022 08:20:54
********************************************************************************
General info:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., QX310/QX410/QX510/SF310/SF410/SF510
Bios version 03MX.M005.20101011.SCY, dated 10/11/2010
Chipset: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series
Harddisk is non-rotational, ie. SSD
The amount of swap currently used is 0
================================================================================
CPU related data:
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 480 @ 2.67GHz
cpu cores : 2
stepping : 5
cache size : 3072 KB
================================================================================
RAM related data:
Maximum Capacity: 8 GB
Size: 4096 MB
Size: 4096 MB
================================================================================
GPU related data:
product: GT218M [GeForce 310M]
product: Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller
configuration: driver=nouveau latency=0
configuration: driver=i915 latency=0
================================================================================
Os related data:
PRETTY_NAME="Linux Mint 18.1"
Desktop: , Session:
================================================================================
Kernel related data:
Kernel 4.8.11-rt7
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash"
Cpu idle driver: intel_idle
================================================================================
Kernel modules data:
Check if pcspkr is loaded: No, good!
Yes, may cause bigger latency.
Check if snd modules are loaded: snd_hda_codec_hdmi 45056 1
snd_hda_codec_realtek 86016 1
snd_hda_codec_generic 73728 1 snd_hda_codec_realtek
snd_hda_intel 40960 3
snd_hda_codec 135168 4 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_generic,snd_hda_codec_realtek
snd_hda_core 86016 5 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_generic,snd_hda_codec_realtek
snd_hwdep 16384 1 snd_hda_codec
snd_pcm 110592 4 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_core,snd_hda_codec_hdmi
snd_seq_midi 16384 0
snd_seq_midi_event 16384 1 snd_seq_midi
snd_rawmidi 32768 1 snd_seq_midi
snd_seq 69632 2 snd_seq_midi_event,snd_seq_midi
snd_seq_device 16384 3 snd_seq,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq_midi
snd_timer 32768 2 snd_seq,snd_pcm
snd 86016 17 snd_hda_intel,snd_hwdep,snd_seq,snd_hda_codec,snd_timer,snd_rawmidi,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_generic,snd_seq_device,snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_pcm
soundcore 16384 1 snd
Yes, may cause bigger latency.
================================================================================
Keyboard & Mouse related data:
Number of mice: 2
Mouse 0 : ETPS/2 Elantech Touchpad
Mouse 1 : Logitech M525
Mice attached to USB:
Keyboards attached to USB:
LinuxCNC related data:
LinuxCNC version is: 2.8.0~pre1
================================================================================
Preparing for latency test:
Started glxgears No. 1
Started glxgears No. 2
Started glxgears No. 3
Started glxgears No. 4
Started glxgears No. 5
..........
Started firefox with '
vimeo.com/150574260
'
================================================================================
Command for latency test is:
su dave -c "latency-histogram --bbinsize 1000 --base 25000 --sbinsize 1000 --nox 2>&1 | tee 1646756410.lat &"
Latency testing loop started Tue Mar 8 08:21:09 PST 2022,
should end after Tue Mar 8 10:21:09 PST 2022
Unexpected realtime delay on task 0 with period 25000
should end after Tue Mar 8 10:21:09 PST 2022
Swap useage: prerun: 0, running: 0
================================================================================
last latency data is as follows:.
9 secs base min: -24.600 uS max: 56.000 uS sdev: 1.100 uS
9 secs servo min: -23.200 uS max: 24.000 uS sdev: 1.300 uS