Mini PC for LinuxCNC/CPU Realtime Performance

More
28 Jan 2026 11:57 #342074 by giaviv
this is great, thanks for the info! what do these results indicate regarding how good this setup is for the linuxcnc application? im new to linuxcnc so the raw data doesn't mean much to me...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tommylight
  • tommylight's Avatar
  • Away
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
28 Jan 2026 12:33 #342077 by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Mini PC for LinuxCNC/CPU Realtime Performance
@NVE,
can you do the latency test with no base period and with added --show at the end as there are excursions on both periods on your screenshot, and base period is not used for Mesa boards.
Thank you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
28 Jan 2026 12:46 #342078 by unknown
Replied by unknown on topic Mini PC for LinuxCNC/CPU Realtime Performance
With Mesa cards latency isn't such as issue as with using the Parallel port. I think the rule of thumb is under 100000ns is good for a mesa card, for about 99% of uses, cos I know someone will have an example that breaks the rule of thumb. Or my numbers may be wrong.
Unlike one forum I can think of we dont have p*$##&€ contests. ;)
If it works and does the job reliably that's the goal.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.268 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum