Code:
latency-histogram --show
There are striped lines on the base period side, this will show the value.
Firstly
Firstly, I apologize for disappearing for several days. I thought I noticed something that let me proceed to try vainly to meet a deadline yesterday. I had partial success, but ultimately called it quits late last night.
Secondly, thank you for your help.
I've attached the latest latency-histogram with an even heavier torture test going on.
I see three ways forward for meJ: 1. continue on the path of trying to find and fix the sources of latency, 2. dial back performance settings to avoid being hit by latency problems, or 3. start over. Of course, I'm partial to #1 because it would be better to have a better understanding of my setup.
I can add now that the original problem I mentioned did not recur, after simply editing the LinuxCNC logo G-code program to change G21 to G20 (and adjusting the scale accordingly), mm to inch mode. It ran without incident in inch.
What caused me to throw in the towel last night was this: after experiencing a Z/joint-2 following error when jogging (at under 200 IPM) and losing position information and having to restart LinuxCNC, I had actually been able to face the workpiece (w/a program of simple back-and-forth passes). However, as I was jogging to set the zeroes for the first roughing pass of a model, it lost position again, this time in the Y-axis. While I suspect the rough pass might have run successfully, I couldn't be sure and I still have the more complicated finish pass to run (which actually might run fine owing to the much fewer and shorter rapids).
To recap:
1. I have copied the config/ directory from the old machine to the new, and have edited only the parport/io addresses,
2. move the PCI (not PCIe) parallel-port cards from the old machine to the new.
3. run stepconf and tested all 3 axes in the back-and-forth mode, confirming I thought the acceleration entries were acceptable.
4. the machine stops abruptly, but not predictably, when jogging (at least in Y and Z so far) with a "joint-following error."