Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC

More
03 Aug 2025 22:44 #332773 by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
A parallel port has only 5 pins exclusive to input.

There are 8 pins that are bi-directional, but I think they have to all be the same direction (all inputs or all outputs).

It probably depends on the parallel port in question.

If your setup was 2-axis, you could use the 4 output-exclusive pins ans use all 8 bidirectional pins as inputs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2025 23:52 #332775 by Cysign
Replied by Cysign on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
Looks like installing LinuxCNC isn't as easy as installing a casual linux.I remember I had to burn DVD when I first installed it and I borrower a DVD drive to install it properly.I flashed the image using Rufus 4.7 and booted from the USB flash drive - but  then the setup mentions "your installation media coultn't be mounted". Is this a known bug? What's the workaround?Also I was unable to set the BIOS to UEFI mode only. There's no option to disable the compatibility mode - so setup outputs warnings when using USB flash drive in EFI mode.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tommylight
  • tommylight's Avatar
  • Away
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
04 Aug 2025 00:38 #332778 by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
At the error, remove the USB device and wait 5 seconds, insert again the USB and wait 15 seconds, click on YES and next.
Usually that works for this, well almost always.
In case it does not work for you:
Download and install Linux Mint Debian Edition, update and upgrade, then
sudo apt install linuxcnc-uspace
-
Warning, this might not be the best option for parallel port use as it might end up with quite high latency.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Cysign

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Aug 2025 00:51 #332779 by Cysign
Replied by Cysign on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
Works, thanks :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Aug 2025 16:10 #332825 by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
Try Ventoy.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Aug 2025 21:09 #332848 by Cysign
Replied by Cysign on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
I just ordered a SSD for this old computer. Now that I know it's working, I would like to speed it up :D
Will this also improve latency for linuxCNC or doesn't it matter, since everything is stored in RAM?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tommylight
  • tommylight's Avatar
  • Away
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
04 Aug 2025 21:13 #332849 by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
SSD will improve latency a bit, but adding more RAM would also help, 8GB is just fine, but i do not recall how much you already have.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Aug 2025 22:43 #332852 by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
SSDs are overrated.

They are mostly good for Windows because NTFS has fragmentation issues.

They do reduce boot time, but that is not really useful.

RAM is faster than any SSD, even "slow" DDR 866MHz is faster.

Make sure your RAM is dual-channel.

You can get double speed with no drawback.

Why not?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tommylight
  • tommylight's Avatar
  • Away
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
04 Aug 2025 23:31 #332856 by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC

SSDs are overrated.

What is that supposed to mean? Any SSD is MUCH faster than a spinning hard drive, so how is this "overrated"

They are mostly good for Windows because NTFS has fragmentation issues.

They are good for all operating systems, not just Windows.

They do reduce boot time, but that is not really useful.

It is useful for everything that needs to be transferred from SSD to system RAM and back, especially when starting any application or closing it, or...

RAM is faster than any SSD, even "slow" DDR 866MHz is faster.

Not a valid comparison so why????

Make sure your RAM is dual-channel.

Yes, this is valid, but requires 2 or 4 sticks of RAM, same size, otherwise it defaults back to single channel.

You can get double speed with no drawback.

Not true, you get more speed, but never double speed, timings, latency, clocks, and some probably 50 more settings and parameters that prevent memory form physically reaching "double speed".

Why not?

Now i must ask, Why?
Why do you keep replying like this?
Again, i admire your will and effort to help others, and some times you do help so thank you for that, but sometimes your replies are like this causing more confusion and noise that is not helpful.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Aug 2025 02:42 #332862 by Cysign
Replied by Cysign on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
Looks like HDDs do have interrupts since they are slow and do need the OS to wait for datatransfers.
I'll see if the latency-test will get better or worse when the SSD will arrive ;)
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.083 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum