Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
- langdons
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 535
- Thank you received: 54
03 Aug 2025 22:44 #332773
by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
A parallel port has only 5 pins exclusive to input.
There are 8 pins that are bi-directional, but I think they have to all be the same direction (all inputs or all outputs).
It probably depends on the parallel port in question.
If your setup was 2-axis, you could use the 4 output-exclusive pins ans use all 8 bidirectional pins as inputs.
There are 8 pins that are bi-directional, but I think they have to all be the same direction (all inputs or all outputs).
It probably depends on the parallel port in question.
If your setup was 2-axis, you could use the 4 output-exclusive pins ans use all 8 bidirectional pins as inputs.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Cysign
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 12
- Thank you received: 1
03 Aug 2025 23:52 #332775
by Cysign
Replied by Cysign on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
Looks like installing LinuxCNC isn't as easy as installing a casual linux.I remember I had to burn DVD when I first installed it and I borrower a DVD drive to install it properly.I flashed the image using Rufus 4.7 and booted from the USB flash drive - but then the setup mentions "your installation media coultn't be mounted". Is this a known bug? What's the workaround?Also I was unable to set the BIOS to UEFI mode only. There's no option to disable the compatibility mode - so setup outputs warnings when using USB flash drive in EFI mode.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 20513
- Thank you received: 6979
04 Aug 2025 00:38 #332778
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
At the error, remove the USB device and wait 5 seconds, insert again the USB and wait 15 seconds, click on YES and next.
Usually that works for this, well almost always.
In case it does not work for you:
Download and install Linux Mint Debian Edition, update and upgrade, then
sudo apt install linuxcnc-uspace
-
Warning, this might not be the best option for parallel port use as it might end up with quite high latency.
Usually that works for this, well almost always.
In case it does not work for you:
Download and install Linux Mint Debian Edition, update and upgrade, then
sudo apt install linuxcnc-uspace
-
Warning, this might not be the best option for parallel port use as it might end up with quite high latency.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Cysign
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Cysign
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 12
- Thank you received: 1
04 Aug 2025 00:51 #332779
by Cysign
Replied by Cysign on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
Works, thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- langdons
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 535
- Thank you received: 54
04 Aug 2025 16:10 #332825
by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
Try Ventoy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Cysign
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 12
- Thank you received: 1
04 Aug 2025 21:09 #332848
by Cysign
Replied by Cysign on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
I just ordered a SSD for this old computer. Now that I know it's working, I would like to speed it up 
Will this also improve latency for linuxCNC or doesn't it matter, since everything is stored in RAM?

Will this also improve latency for linuxCNC or doesn't it matter, since everything is stored in RAM?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 20513
- Thank you received: 6979
04 Aug 2025 21:13 #332849
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
SSD will improve latency a bit, but adding more RAM would also help, 8GB is just fine, but i do not recall how much you already have.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- langdons
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 535
- Thank you received: 54
04 Aug 2025 22:43 #332852
by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
SSDs are overrated.
They are mostly good for Windows because NTFS has fragmentation issues.
They do reduce boot time, but that is not really useful.
RAM is faster than any SSD, even "slow" DDR 866MHz is faster.
Make sure your RAM is dual-channel.
You can get double speed with no drawback.
Why not?
They are mostly good for Windows because NTFS has fragmentation issues.
They do reduce boot time, but that is not really useful.
RAM is faster than any SSD, even "slow" DDR 866MHz is faster.
Make sure your RAM is dual-channel.
You can get double speed with no drawback.
Why not?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 20513
- Thank you received: 6979
04 Aug 2025 23:31 #332856
by tommylight
Why do you keep replying like this?
Again, i admire your will and effort to help others, and some times you do help so thank you for that, but sometimes your replies are like this causing more confusion and noise that is not helpful.
Replied by tommylight on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
What is that supposed to mean? Any SSD is MUCH faster than a spinning hard drive, so how is this "overrated"SSDs are overrated.
They are good for all operating systems, not just Windows.They are mostly good for Windows because NTFS has fragmentation issues.
It is useful for everything that needs to be transferred from SSD to system RAM and back, especially when starting any application or closing it, or...They do reduce boot time, but that is not really useful.
Not a valid comparison so why????RAM is faster than any SSD, even "slow" DDR 866MHz is faster.
Yes, this is valid, but requires 2 or 4 sticks of RAM, same size, otherwise it defaults back to single channel.Make sure your RAM is dual-channel.
Not true, you get more speed, but never double speed, timings, latency, clocks, and some probably 50 more settings and parameters that prevent memory form physically reaching "double speed".You can get double speed with no drawback.
Now i must ask, Why?Why not?
Why do you keep replying like this?
Again, i admire your will and effort to help others, and some times you do help so thank you for that, but sometimes your replies are like this causing more confusion and noise that is not helpful.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Cysign
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 12
- Thank you received: 1
05 Aug 2025 02:42 #332862
by Cysign
Replied by Cysign on topic Interfaces & linear scale for LinuxCNC
Looks like HDDs do have interrupts since they are slow and do need the OS to wait for datatransfers.
I'll see if the latency-test will get better or worse when the SSD will arrive
I'll see if the latency-test will get better or worse when the SSD will arrive

The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.083 seconds