- Configuring LinuxCNC
- Configuration Tools
- PnCConf Wizard
- Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
19 Jun 2019 21:09 - 19 Jun 2019 21:38 #137310
by HueyHQ
Replied by HueyHQ on topic Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
Sorry Peter, I had that error initially, also, but can't remember what caused it; I'll have a look today and see if I can figure what it is was.
[EDIT:] Try adding remap.py to your /python folder (knew I'd forget something!). I've edited my other post , so it's all in one place.
[EDIT:] Try adding remap.py to your /python folder (knew I'd forget something!). I've edited my other post , so it's all in one place.
Last edit: 19 Jun 2019 21:38 by HueyHQ.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Peterdeleu
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 99
- Thank you received: 0
19 Jun 2019 21:58 #137311
by Peterdeleu
Replied by Peterdeleu on topic Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
No problem
It is my intention to read the manual as Bevins suggested.
But there's a lot to read, and try and error takes time!
I just spend 2 hours just to enable an external estop
It is my intention to read the manual as Bevins suggested.
But there's a lot to read, and try and error takes time!
I just spend 2 hours just to enable an external estop
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Jun 2019 23:27 - 20 Jun 2019 00:32 #137315
by bevins
Replied by bevins on topic Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
It's looking for a remap. Your toplevel is probably importing remap and it doesn't exist.
Look at this structure.
Look at this structure.
Last edit: 20 Jun 2019 00:32 by bevins.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Peterdeleu
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 99
- Thank you received: 0
20 Jun 2019 00:21 #137318
by Peterdeleu
Replied by Peterdeleu on topic Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
I'll test this tomorrow, if I find some time anyway
But I have another question. I don't have much experience, so my question can be stupid. But anyway
My machine is a Biesse Rover. This machine has retractable stops to align the material. The stops I want to use is on the left and at the rear.
But now I see that LinuxCNC has a different WCS system.
Maybe I don't use the right words, but I mean that I'm not able to set the correct WCS in Fusion 360 (and linuxcnc) . If I align the material to the rear left corner, this means that the +Y-axis direction should point to the front of the machine.
The +X-direction to the right, and the +Z-axis upwards.
Can I solve this?
I hope my explanation is clear
But I have another question. I don't have much experience, so my question can be stupid. But anyway
My machine is a Biesse Rover. This machine has retractable stops to align the material. The stops I want to use is on the left and at the rear.
But now I see that LinuxCNC has a different WCS system.
Maybe I don't use the right words, but I mean that I'm not able to set the correct WCS in Fusion 360 (and linuxcnc) . If I align the material to the rear left corner, this means that the +Y-axis direction should point to the front of the machine.
The +X-direction to the right, and the +Z-axis upwards.
Can I solve this?
I hope my explanation is clear
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 Jun 2019 00:28 #137321
by bevins
Replied by bevins on topic Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
Your machine homes back left probably. Most Biesse does.
In Fusion360 you have to change your WCS to match when you do your cam.
In Fusion360 you have to change your WCS to match when you do your cam.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Peterdeleu
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 99
- Thank you received: 0
20 Jun 2019 00:36 #137322
by Peterdeleu
Replied by Peterdeleu on topic Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
Indeed, home is left back.
I've spend hours to find a solution, but it looks like the WCS is fixed. The only thing that you can do is change the origin and turn it around. Changing the direction of only 1 axis is impossible.
In the screen capture included in this message is the origin correct, also the X and Z axis, but I want to point the Y to the other site.
If I do so, the X turns the other way...
I've spend hours to find a solution, but it looks like the WCS is fixed. The only thing that you can do is change the origin and turn it around. Changing the direction of only 1 axis is impossible.
In the screen capture included in this message is the origin correct, also the X and Z axis, but I want to point the Y to the other site.
If I do so, the X turns the other way...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 Jun 2019 00:50 #137323
by HueyHQ
Replied by HueyHQ on topic Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
My Busellato is similar.
I've re-configured my machine axes so that Y-axis runs from the back stops (home) and negative towards the front (originally, that was positive direction like yours). Also did the same for the Z-axis for best CAM-compatibility, but it sounds like the Biesse is opposite?
I don't use Fusion360 (yet) so can't help set your WCS, but in the package I use, the WCS is in the top-left corner and I model in the X+/Y- quadrant.
I've re-configured my machine axes so that Y-axis runs from the back stops (home) and negative towards the front (originally, that was positive direction like yours). Also did the same for the Z-axis for best CAM-compatibility, but it sounds like the Biesse is opposite?
I don't use Fusion360 (yet) so can't help set your WCS, but in the package I use, the WCS is in the top-left corner and I model in the X+/Y- quadrant.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 Jun 2019 01:00 - 20 Jun 2019 01:02 #137326
by bevins
Replied by bevins on topic Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
That looks wrong to me. Facing my biesse, left to right X asix back to front Y axis. My machine homes back left.
I just tried fusion360 and I can get it correctly. You should be able to also. I dont like how fusion360 does their WCS as it is a bit tough to get it right.
Wait...... if your Y is pointing to the back of the machine then I think that is correct.
I just tried fusion360 and I can get it correctly. You should be able to also. I dont like how fusion360 does their WCS as it is a bit tough to get it right.
Wait...... if your Y is pointing to the back of the machine then I think that is correct.
Last edit: 20 Jun 2019 01:02 by bevins.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Peterdeleu
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 99
- Thank you received: 0
20 Jun 2019 01:10 #137329
by Peterdeleu
Replied by Peterdeleu on topic Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
In fusion, my Y is pointing backwards yes, but is this correct? Shouldn’t it point forwards? This is the + directiion of the biesse.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 Jun 2019 01:29 #137332
by bevins
Thats correct.
Replied by bevins on topic Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
In fusion, my Y is pointing backwards yes, but is this correct? Shouldn’t it point forwards? This is the + directiion of the biesse.
Thats correct.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: cmorley
- Configuring LinuxCNC
- Configuration Tools
- PnCConf Wizard
- Test LinuxCNC without motors and encoders connected
Time to create page: 0.172 seconds