- Posts: 75
- Thank you received: 9
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I did the tests with new servos, the error was 0.0155, I have not adjusted the servos.What was the error in the oscilloscope?
the truth is that I get better results with PID in linuxcnc at high speeds I think not,Is it even realistic to achieve a better result than 0.002 mm with Delta?
it's very good!El eje X está bien. Hay un error de 0,0025 mm. Ver "result.png
I did not realize that you were using a gate with 2 motors, I find it quite difficult to configure two PIDs to feed 2 motors at the same time and that its precision is extreme, I think that if you need such precision you could try to re-set the controller mode and go to position mode, leaving the PID in the servo drive, and the portico having a master motor and another slave, all configured in the servo drive, leaving linuxcnc free of heavy load. I'm not an expert and there are so many guys on the forum that you sure have a better ideaBut for the Y-axis (gantry), I found that both servos were arguing. At least I think according to the picture "2xY.png". It is at a manual crossing of 18000mm / min. The eye can see how the portal vibrates.
I don't know how to set it up to improve.
Due to inaccurate combs I have to use Y1.comp file and Y.comp file. And it will be more complicated.
Thank you so much for the ideas.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.