Updating to latest version of 2.8
18 Jun 2019 23:04 #137245
by bevins
NP,
I wouldn't worry about the heat that much. Put a fan, and/or heatsink and leave it at that.
I had my stepper machine on for about 8 months and never turned it off. They only get to really hot, but not more.....
get to making chips, or uuugh sawdust or whatever it is your creating.
Replied by bevins on topic Updating to latest version of 2.8
Finally, a chance to thank you personally for the reversing shout-out!
Yes, I'm running @ 48vdc, but as yet have no way to measure current draw. That's in the works. I notice that the article that MESA has up indicates a substantial decrease in case temp with just an external fan. That's probably my next step. And, I think I have a couple of old CPU heat sinks around somewhere that may get repurposed, although MESA didn't seem to find a lot of benefit there.
Thanks, again, for the help!
Leonard
NP,
I wouldn't worry about the heat that much. Put a fan, and/or heatsink and leave it at that.
I had my stepper machine on for about 8 months and never turned it off. They only get to really hot, but not more.....
get to making chips, or uuugh sawdust or whatever it is your creating.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 Jun 2019 03:52 #137341
by mac44mag
Replied by mac44mag on topic Updating to latest version of 2.8
True to your advice, I ran a couple of 45 min.tests today with a repurposed computer fan ~6" from the back of the G540. The results paralleled the ones Mesa has posted for their heatsink experiment. The high temp on the back of the unit never went above 49 deg. C. for either test. I'd terminated the same two tests a couple of days ago inside of 20 min. when case back temps exceeded 65 deg. C.
The only caveat is that I wasn't actually cutting anything. It will be interesting to see if things change when I do.
Thanks again to all for the great help!
Leonard.
The only caveat is that I wasn't actually cutting anything. It will be interesting to see if things change when I do.
Thanks again to all for the great help!
Leonard.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
01 Sep 2019 16:40 #143795
by mac44mag
Replied by mac44mag on topic Updating to latest version of 2.8
Any indication of when v2.8 actually goes stable? Or, have I just had my head in the sand and missed it?
My master/pre-release of late June appears to be working just fine.
Thanks!
Leonard
My master/pre-release of late June appears to be working just fine.
Thanks!
Leonard
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
02 Sep 2019 21:00 #143947
by andypugh
No. I was expecting it to be last Christmas!
But it depends on the Release Manager.
Replied by andypugh on topic Updating to latest version of 2.8
Any indication of when v2.8 actually goes stable?
No. I was expecting it to be last Christmas!
But it depends on the Release Manager.
The following user(s) said Thank You: toplakd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jalfrezi19
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
31 Oct 2019 22:09 #149312
by Jalfrezi19
I cannot get updated to 2.8 or 2.9 because I can't seem to get past this point. Is this a command that I enter in the terminal?
Sander
Replied by Jalfrezi19 on topic Updating to latest version of 2.8
2, Create: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/linuxcnc-buildbot.list and add...
deb buildbot.linuxcnc.org/ stretch 2.8-rtpreempt
deb-src buildbot.linuxcnc.org/ stretch 2.8-rtpreempt
Leonard
I cannot get updated to 2.8 or 2.9 because I can't seem to get past this point. Is this a command that I enter in the terminal?
Sander
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
01 Nov 2019 10:55 #149345
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Updating to latest version of 2.8
You can edit the repositories in Synaptic, if you prefer.
Something like "settings / software sources / other software" I think.
Something like "settings / software sources / other software" I think.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.093 seconds