2.9.5 should not be available to download due to it being broken.

The post I put earlier was from trying to install the package manually, by
Trying to install from the Linuxcnc repos would break the build. And to be honest I think the Release may only reference the doc files. I'd have to check my notes for sure on that one. I may be wrong but I remember having a look through it.

andypugh wrote:

We also now have packages being built by Github.

github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/releases/tag/v2.9.7

When will GitHub start building versions for 2.10/master branch? It really is necessary.

Most people expect to be able to install packages just usually apt or apt-get, as far as I know github doesn't provide the resources to host a git repo.

I meant deb repo.

unknown wrote:

Most people expect to be able to install packages just usually apt or apt-get, as far as I know github doesn't provide the resources to host a git repo.

no but a script could copy new versions from git releases to the existing LinuxCNC Deb repository

I not too sure what you mean, Linuxcnc does provide a server with ISO downloads and repos. It has done for many many years.

Actually apt is not stupid, if you ever used a RedHat distro in the 1990's or ealry 2000's you would know that dependencies had to be manually searched and installed. Slackware had the same issue as well, tho it did not have quite the software support a lot of packages had to be built by hand.

debs are a godsend, all dependencies are with the file it self (99.9999% of the time), everything is done automagically.

And honestly to not be able to install the latest packages via apt is really breaking the package system. A machinist may not want to download a script and then run it to install an update, they would prefer a simple way of doing it, apt & apt-get provide that method. And it is insurance from users trying to install packages they shouldn't, apt provides that.

Theres a lot of "behind the scenes" things that are involved in adding a deb package to a repo, it's not just about copying a file. Even when using a proxy to cache debs more things happen than just storing the file.

So before one goes shooting their mouth off, try setup reprepro on a server to provide a repo and have a look at what's involved. Or apt-cacher-ng and see if the files can link to external files.

I don't get why you have such an interest in thing being free. It's a little creepy.