- Posts: 5713
- Thank you received: 2100
QTPlasmaC with fourth axis - rotary
3 years 4 months ago #273235
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic QTPlasmaC with fourth axis - rotary
I have a possible solution which at first glance appears viable in a virtual machine but I need to do some halscope plots on my table. I won’t have time to do that for a couple of days or so.
The following user(s) said Thank You: snowgoer540
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
3 years 4 months ago #273238
by mariusl
Regards
Marius
www.bluearccnc.com
Replied by mariusl on topic QTPlasmaC with fourth axis - rotary
Thanks Phill that is awesome news. We are waiting in anticipation image missing /media/kunena/emoticons/tongue.png
Regards
Marius
www.bluearccnc.com
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
3 years 4 months ago #273364
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic QTPlasmaC with fourth axis - rotary
Unfortunately that idea didn't pan out. Another of those too good to be true moments...
Do you know if SheetCam can output the X/Y/Z moves in incremental distance mode (G91). That may work but I haven't looked too hard as I am not sure that it is an option.
Failing that it seems that we will need to inhibit the inbuilt height sensing and revert to G38 probing for tube cutting in this case.
Do you know if SheetCam can output the X/Y/Z moves in incremental distance mode (G91). That may work but I haven't looked too hard as I am not sure that it is an option.
Failing that it seems that we will need to inhibit the inbuilt height sensing and revert to G38 probing for tube cutting in this case.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
3 years 4 months ago #273373
by mariusl
Regards
Marius
www.bluearccnc.com
Replied by mariusl on topic QTPlasmaC with fourth axis - rotary
I would think that the G38 route would be best as that is already incorporated in the Sheetcam post processor output.
As far as the incremental output goes, I am sure that could also be done in the post processor but Les will have to answer that. I will alert him.
As far as the incremental output goes, I am sure that could also be done in the post processor but Les will have to answer that. I will alert him.
Regards
Marius
www.bluearccnc.com
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
3 years 4 months ago #273375
by LesNewell
Replied by LesNewell on topic QTPlasmaC with fourth axis - rotary
I thought i was subscribed to this thread but didn't receive any notifications. Thanks Marius for giving me the heads up.
Inhibiting the built in probing would work for me. Probing gets complicated on square section so it's easiest for me to have SheetCam generate suitable G38 probing moves.
Phillc54 the post can do incremental but I generally find incremental to be a pain to work with so I try to avoid it.
Inhibiting the built in probing would work for me. Probing gets complicated on square section so it's easiest for me to have SheetCam generate suitable G38 probing moves.
Phillc54 the post can do incremental but I generally find incremental to be a pain to work with so I try to avoid it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
3 years 4 months ago #273386
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic QTPlasmaC with fourth axis - rotary
Les, would you have a typical tube cutting gcode file with two or three cuts in it that I could have a peek at.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: snowgoer540
Time to create page: 0.062 seconds