qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
- seebaer1976
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 33
- Thank you received: 1
07 Jul 2020 17:05 #173869
by seebaer1976
Replied by seebaer1976 on topic qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
Hi,
would declare myself ready to test when the time comes.
unfortunately i have no idea about python, i'm learning it.
markus
would declare myself ready to test when the time comes.
unfortunately i have no idea about python, i'm learning it.
markus
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
23 Jul 2020 05:31 - 23 Jul 2020 05:32 #175463
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
Notice the modified version of Qtdragon. There it is possible to use the WZ-Probe macro.
forum.linuxcnc.org/qtvcp/38247-sample-qt...eens?start=30#168892
If you are interested, I have a version with the latest changes.
Last edit: 23 Jul 2020 05:32 by hottabich.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- seebaer1976
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 33
- Thank you received: 1
23 Jul 2020 17:52 #175556
by seebaer1976
Replied by seebaer1976 on topic qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
hi hottabich,
what was changed? The last change of qtdragon was on github 12 days ago.
interested would like to test it
what was changed? The last change of qtdragon was on github 12 days ago.
interested would like to test it
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
23 Jul 2020 19:16 #175564
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
Open post # 168892 on link, download, run and you will see three options there.hi hottabich,
what was changed? The last change of qtdragon was on github 12 days ago.
interested would like to test it
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- seebaer1976
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 33
- Thank you received: 1
25 Jul 2020 13:15 #175740
by seebaer1976
Hi,
looks good, but unfortunately too big.
unfortunately only have a resolution of 1440x900.
making smaller is not possible, otherwise the arrangement will be lost or?
Replied by seebaer1976 on topic qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
Open post # 168892 on link, download, run and you will see three options there.
Hi,
looks good, but unfortunately too big.
unfortunately only have a resolution of 1440x900.
making smaller is not possible, otherwise the arrangement will be lost or?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
25 Jul 2020 16:23 - 25 Jul 2020 17:36 #175748
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
Is QtDragon original right for you? QtDragon is missing the Mdi Touchy widget for macros, I think so.What is your opinion? Is this option as in the screenshot suitable?
Open post # 168892 on link, download, run and you will see three options there.
Hi,
looks good, but unfortunately too big.
unfortunately only have a resolution of 1440x900.
making smaller is not possible, otherwise the arrangement will be lost or?
Last edit: 25 Jul 2020 17:36 by hottabich.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- seebaer1976
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 33
- Thank you received: 1
25 Jul 2020 18:32 - 25 Jul 2020 18:35 #175770
by seebaer1976
Replied by seebaer1976 on topic qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
thank you for your help.
the original qtdragon is just the right size.
think the mditouchy is not the right one.
the only thing missing is a remap m6 macro, which in the case of a milling process with several tools, measures the new tool again after clamping and adjusts the offset against the reference tool.
as I post forum.linuxcnc.org/qtvcp/39423-qtdragon-...hange?start=0#173125 and forum.linuxcnc.org/qtvcp/39423-qtdragon-...hange?start=0#173323 times.
the original qtdragon is just the right size.
think the mditouchy is not the right one.
the only thing missing is a remap m6 macro, which in the case of a milling process with several tools, measures the new tool again after clamping and adjusts the offset against the reference tool.
as I post forum.linuxcnc.org/qtvcp/39423-qtdragon-...hange?start=0#173125 and forum.linuxcnc.org/qtvcp/39423-qtdragon-...hange?start=0#173323 times.
Last edit: 25 Jul 2020 18:35 by seebaer1976.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Jul 2020 06:57 - 26 Jul 2020 06:58 #175862
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
How can you use a macro in qtdragon without mditouchy or mdi_tab? I created a macro for myself return. At any moment I stop the program, go wherever I want, do what I need with the instrument, come back and continue running the program. Not suitable for shape cutter
Last edit: 26 Jul 2020 06:58 by hottabich.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- seebaer1976
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 33
- Thank you received: 1
26 Jul 2020 08:24 - 26 Jul 2020 17:07 #175869
by seebaer1976
Replied by seebaer1976 on topic qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
the macro is automatically called up and executed when the tool is pending, with the line in the ini (REMAP = M6 modalgroup = 6 ngc = tool_change).
just do not get the macro right, the difference is calculated correctly
since we calculated something somewhere again, either in linuxcnc itself or with qtdragon.
just do not get the macro right, the difference is calculated correctly
since we calculated something somewhere again, either in linuxcnc itself or with qtdragon.
Last edit: 26 Jul 2020 17:07 by seebaer1976.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Jul 2020 14:44 #175904
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
Mdi Touchy allows you to use controlled macros. You can adjust the macro for your tasks.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: cmorley
Time to create page: 0.093 seconds