- Posts: 972
- Thank you received: 167
The problem with it is that it's a plastic box, besides the fact that nobody's gonna buy one of those at the price for them brand new for this space. They're $250 for the XL. Being that it's that expensive I don't think anyone would really want to chop it up or glue it to something to make it practical, a box sitting on a desk isn't really the form factor that works out for machine tools.Building something similar from scratch is really not that hard from a software/firmware standpoint. I think it would be a fair amount of work to replicate similar hardware so it looks as nice and functions as reliably, but not impossible.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Capacitive's would work, probably better, they just need special consideration. I don't think touchscreens would work that well in general to be honest, they aren't meant to be activated with large surfaces like wide buttons and the touch layer is fragile.Any LCD with a Resistive touchscreen (new Capacitve won't work), most new PC's have more than one Video output, so that would connect to the free output, the a bit of software to make sure each section of the screen remains the same size no matter what is shown and change the video accordingly, that is all there is to it.
Hardware part is easy enough, software takes a bit more doing to get it right, although i would go for hardware solution to keep the sizes and limits in check, makes it less flexible but easier to use.
Software solution would allow for full screen video and gif's and blinking signs and such, although those could also be done in hardware but would require flashing to change.
-
On the topic of HMI, what would fall into that category?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I would much rather have a dumptruck hardwired operating in real time than a Ferrari dependent on a USB connection!
I would rather buy an industrial wireless pendant/MPG for similar money.
This is another topic, but those wireless MPG's have never seemed like a great idea to me. They look convenient, especially for large routers or plasma tables, but potentially fraught with peril. How robust is the wireless protocol, and how exactly does it behave with potential interruptions/interference? I definitely sleep better using hard-wired controls for potentially dangerous and expensive CNC machines.
I saw one with an mushroom E-Stop on it, which seemed optimistic at best. I don't think that would pass any sort of safety system design review. It could be designed to fail safe if the wireless link drops out, but then if you had a brief interruption of the wireless link, your whole system would go into E-Stop and potentially ruin work or tools. If it's more tolerant of wireless dropouts, then it no longer is truly safe as an E-Stop.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.