Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
19 Jun 2012 04:57 #21080
by gera229
Replied by gera229 on topic Re:Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
Software step generation refers to micro stepping correct?
I mean at 15k or less latency I will be fine right?
As for HAL, I don't think I would need to mess with that.
I'm building a hobby cnc machine, not using a commerical grade machine so I am not expecting max performance. I only expect reliability and consistency.
I mean at 15k or less latency I will be fine right?
As for HAL, I don't think I would need to mess with that.
I'm building a hobby cnc machine, not using a commerical grade machine so I am not expecting max performance. I only expect reliability and consistency.
The topic has been locked.
19 Jun 2012 05:08 #21081
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Re:Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
"Software step generation refers to micro stepping correct?"
No, with software step generation the step pulse timing is all done in software with
LinuxCNC directly controlling the timing of the step and dir signals.
15K latency is probably fine and will allow step rates up to around 30KHz, which will exceed
the step rate capabilities of many step drives and motors
No, with software step generation the step pulse timing is all done in software with
LinuxCNC directly controlling the timing of the step and dir signals.
15K latency is probably fine and will allow step rates up to around 30KHz, which will exceed
the step rate capabilities of many step drives and motors
The topic has been locked.
19 Jun 2012 10:20 #21088
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Re:Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
gera229 wrote:
The alternative is hardware step generation, where LinuxCNC instructs hardware what step rate is required, and the hardware produces step pulses at that rate.
No, it refers to generating step pulses from the parallel port or other hardware using software running on the PC.Software step generation refers to micro stepping correct?
The alternative is hardware step generation, where LinuxCNC instructs hardware what step rate is required, and the hardware produces step pulses at that rate.
Yes, I had a machine working perfectly well with 30k latency.I mean at 15k or less latency I will be fine right?
You will need to, but stepgen will do most or all of the work for you. HAL is the layer where motion commands get transferred to step pulse generators, and where the output of the step generators are connected to specific parallel port pins.As for HAL, I don't think I would need to mess with that.
The topic has been locked.
19 Jun 2012 22:17 - 19 Jun 2012 22:21 #21129
by gera229
Replied by gera229 on topic Re:Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
It's just that I still don't know what HAL is so I was concerned about that, but I guess I will figure it out on the way.
My D525MW board arrived and upon close inspection I caught something strange:
Here you can see that I spotted the word/ brand Foxconn:
Here below you can see the yellow jumper: is that default and is it correct in the right position compared to your board?
Also you can see those screws on board, what are those?
In this image it shows the word Canada on the bottom of the board, is this right?
Also I circled a solder joint on the right side of a resistor in the center of the image, but not on the left side of the same resistor? Is it like that on your board too? Inspect solder joints around that area on your board, is it the same as on mines?:
If you still cannot find that solder joint I am talking about look for a red circle to the left of the recycling arrows with the number 10 where the resistor are.
Do you guys have this on your boards? I want to verify that this is a genuine board. I cannot see anywhere on the board where it says D525MW, but I do see it on the box. But I still would like to verify to make sure a random board was not put into the box. Also to verify that this board is not Chinese counterfeit or something.
I got a used board, and I find it necessary to inspect it.
My D525MW board arrived and upon close inspection I caught something strange:
Here you can see that I spotted the word/ brand Foxconn:
Here below you can see the yellow jumper: is that default and is it correct in the right position compared to your board?
Also you can see those screws on board, what are those?
In this image it shows the word Canada on the bottom of the board, is this right?
Also I circled a solder joint on the right side of a resistor in the center of the image, but not on the left side of the same resistor? Is it like that on your board too? Inspect solder joints around that area on your board, is it the same as on mines?:
If you still cannot find that solder joint I am talking about look for a red circle to the left of the recycling arrows with the number 10 where the resistor are.
Do you guys have this on your boards? I want to verify that this is a genuine board. I cannot see anywhere on the board where it says D525MW, but I do see it on the box. But I still would like to verify to make sure a random board was not put into the box. Also to verify that this board is not Chinese counterfeit or something.
I got a used board, and I find it necessary to inspect it.
Last edit: 19 Jun 2012 22:21 by gera229.
The topic has been locked.
19 Jun 2012 22:33 #21130
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Re:Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
Foxconn probably made the connectors.
(They make iPhones, too, so I don't think they are in the counterfeit business)
pics.computerbase.de/3/4/3/5/8/3.jpg
Also shows Foxconn connectors
(They make iPhones, too, so I don't think they are in the counterfeit business)
pics.computerbase.de/3/4/3/5/8/3.jpg
Also shows Foxconn connectors
The topic has been locked.
19 Jun 2012 23:44 #21132
by gera229
Replied by gera229 on topic Re:Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
Ok, well according to this image:
www.ixbt.com/mainboard/intel/d525mw/01-b.jpg
One of the is not Foxconn, that's why I asked a member from this forum to look at their own board. Just curious although I don't think I should make a big deal at out of it.
www.ixbt.com/mainboard/intel/d525mw/01-b.jpg
One of the is not Foxconn, that's why I asked a member from this forum to look at their own board. Just curious although I don't think I should make a big deal at out of it.
The topic has been locked.
19 Jun 2012 23:54 #21133
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Re:Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
Intel probably change suppliers throughout the life of a board.
The topic has been locked.
21 Jun 2012 04:57 #21162
by gera229
Replied by gera229 on topic Re:Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
What version of Ubuntu should I get?
I'm downloading from the ubuntu website.
I'm downloading from the ubuntu website.
The topic has been locked.
21 Jun 2012 09:04 #21165
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Re:Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
gera229 wrote:
That will just make things more complicated. Download the Live CD from the LinuxCNC site, then you will have the correct Ubuntu version and Kernel.
(link top left of this site)
What version of Ubuntu should I get?
I'm downloading from the ubuntu website.
That will just make things more complicated. Download the Live CD from the LinuxCNC site, then you will have the correct Ubuntu version and Kernel.
(link top left of this site)
The topic has been locked.
22 Jun 2012 06:29 #21188
by gera229
Replied by gera229 on topic Re:Atom 330 or D525 or D510?
Anyone here do a dual boot setup?
I finally installed everything with Windows installed first and followed this guide after defragmenting the hard drive: apcmag.com/how_to_dual_boot_windows_xp_a...led_first.htm?page=1
After Linux was installed, I boot into Windows and before it went to Windows XP it actually asked to check the disk and did it automatically after 10 seconds which I let it do.
While everything seems like it works good I want to ask, is was that checking procedure done by Windows XP normal? Did it happen to you?
I finally installed everything with Windows installed first and followed this guide after defragmenting the hard drive: apcmag.com/how_to_dual_boot_windows_xp_a...led_first.htm?page=1
After Linux was installed, I boot into Windows and before it went to Windows XP it actually asked to check the disk and did it automatically after 10 seconds which I let it do.
While everything seems like it works good I want to ask, is was that checking procedure done by Windows XP normal? Did it happen to you?
The topic has been locked.
Time to create page: 0.201 seconds