Remora - ethernet NVEM / EC300 / EC500 cnc board
- Thayloreing
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 88
- Thank you received: 2
18 May 2025 21:11 #328716
by Thayloreing
Replied by Thayloreing on topic Remora - ethernet NVEM / EC300 / EC500 cnc board
Hi Scotta, do you happen to know what the error I'm having means? It seems like it's not communicating with the cloud in any way.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JPeters
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
18 May 2025 22:06 #328717
by JPeters
Replied by JPeters on topic Remora - ethernet NVEM / EC300 / EC500 cnc board
Hello scotta,
thank you for your quick reply. Yes, that is exactly what I thought myself.
The EC500 is powered by an external power supply. From the 6 pin header, GND, SCK and SDO have been connected to one of the probes.
I don´t have any kind of schematic on hands for the EC500. So I am not shure, why the header pin is labeled SDO. I would expect SDIO for a sufficient SWD connector. Is your header labeled with a SDO too?
My EC500 is labeled with IMXR_EC500 2023-05-18
Up to now, there has not been a single successful flash. From within MCUExpresso, I am at least able to build your application.
If this is not going to be successful: do you think, your actual project with W5500 and raspberry pi pico is as powerful as the 1052 solution and could be a viable alternative?
Thank you very much. I will try to give more details tomorrow.
Cheers Julius
thank you for your quick reply. Yes, that is exactly what I thought myself.
The EC500 is powered by an external power supply. From the 6 pin header, GND, SCK and SDO have been connected to one of the probes.
I don´t have any kind of schematic on hands for the EC500. So I am not shure, why the header pin is labeled SDO. I would expect SDIO for a sufficient SWD connector. Is your header labeled with a SDO too?
My EC500 is labeled with IMXR_EC500 2023-05-18
Up to now, there has not been a single successful flash. From within MCUExpresso, I am at least able to build your application.
If this is not going to be successful: do you think, your actual project with W5500 and raspberry pi pico is as powerful as the 1052 solution and could be a viable alternative?
Thank you very much. I will try to give more details tomorrow.
Cheers Julius
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DarkPhoinix
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 105
- Thank you received: 6
19 May 2025 11:17 #328735
by DarkPhoinix
Replied by DarkPhoinix on topic Remora - ethernet NVEM / EC300 / EC500 cnc board
is there a way to download previously uploaded nvem-rt1052.txt from NVEM?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- scotta
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 916
- Thank you received: 474
19 May 2025 20:30 #328754
by scotta
Remora supports quite a number of 3D printer boards. The EC300/500 being 24V IO is more suited when using industrial hardware.
Replied by scotta on topic Remora - ethernet NVEM / EC300 / EC500 cnc board
I'll need to check the labelling on my boards. With MCUExpressoIDE does it report an error when trying to connect. It may give some clues.Hello scotta,
thank you for your quick reply. Yes, that is exactly what I thought myself.
The EC500 is powered by an external power supply. From the 6 pin header, GND, SCK and SDO have been connected to one of the probes.
I don´t have any kind of schematic on hands for the EC500. So I am not shure, why the header pin is labeled SDO. I would expect SDIO for a sufficient SWD connector. Is your header labeled with a SDO too?
My EC500 is labeled with IMXR_EC500 2023-05-18
Up to now, there has not been a single successful flash. From within MCUExpresso, I am at least able to build your application.
If this is not going to be successful: do you think, your actual project with W5500 and raspberry pi pico is as powerful as the 1052 solution and could be a viable alternative?
Thank you very much. I will try to give more details tomorrow.
Cheers Julius
Remora supports quite a number of 3D printer boards. The EC300/500 being 24V IO is more suited when using industrial hardware.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- scotta
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 916
- Thank you received: 474
19 May 2025 20:33 #328755
by scotta
Replied by scotta on topic Remora - ethernet NVEM / EC300 / EC500 cnc board
is there a way to download previously uploaded nvem-rt1052.txt from NVEM?
Unfortunately, no. It's a one way process.
The following user(s) said Thank You: DarkPhoinix
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DarkPhoinix
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 105
- Thank you received: 6
19 May 2025 20:37 #328756
by DarkPhoinix
Thank you very much.
Isn't there a way to calculate SCALE in a precise way? Unfortunately the seller of my steppers and Drivers doesn't give me datasheets and it's really difficult to set them up properly, except trying random values. I also tried with math but nothing I couldn't get low error values Scale=scale_set*Dist_measured/Dist_Insert
Replied by DarkPhoinix on topic Remora - ethernet NVEM / EC300 / EC500 cnc board
I wanted to give it a high pulse/rev value to have a higher resolution, but I couldn't get precision in long movements. I put your values and after a slight change of scale everything went well!
Warning: Spoiler!At the risk of the blind leading the blind, to me that is not quite the right question. That chart is for your micro-stepping. Like the 800 is 4 microsteps, if you're using a 1.8 deg. stepper. I have always looked at it this way - What are you doing with the motor? If your opening a door or driving a ram, picking 800 would be fine, but using that on a belt or lead screw may very well end up leaving artifacts in the work due to the rougher movement between points. The downside is the more micro-steps you have the more torque you lose. 3200 (16 micro-steps) seams to be a reasonable middle ground that most use as standard. The controller will put out as many steps as directed by LinuxCNC to make a revolution, just a matter of how fast it can do it.
Whatever you chose, that gets figured out when you tell LinuxCNC in your .ini file how many pulses it takes to move one unit. That is set with the SCALE on each axis. Like for me, I have 16 micro-steps (3200) and a 5mm pitch screw, which works out to SCALE = 640 or -640 depending which way you need the motor to move.
Thank you very much.
Isn't there a way to calculate SCALE in a precise way? Unfortunately the seller of my steppers and Drivers doesn't give me datasheets and it's really difficult to set them up properly, except trying random values. I also tried with math but nothing I couldn't get low error values Scale=scale_set*Dist_measured/Dist_Insert
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DarkPhoinix
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 105
- Thank you received: 6
19 May 2025 20:49 #328758
by DarkPhoinix
Thank you for doing this amazing job and allowing me to use linuxcnc with my low budget hardware!
Replied by DarkPhoinix on topic Remora - ethernet NVEM / EC300 / EC500 cnc board
Thanks a lot, I'll do some bck just to be safe.
Warning: Spoiler!DarkPhoinix post=328735 userid=35952 is there a way to download previously uploaded nvem-rt1052.txt from NVEM? Unfortunately, no. It's a one way process.
Thank you for doing this amazing job and allowing me to use linuxcnc with my low budget hardware!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- scotta
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 916
- Thank you received: 474
19 May 2025 20:51 #328759
by scotta
Replied by scotta on topic Remora - ethernet NVEM / EC300 / EC500 cnc board
I'd always recommend calculating the joint SCALE based on the hardware. ie steps per revolution of the stepper motor and then the leadscrew pitch etc. If the actual movement achieved is not correct I'd be suspicious of lost steps, especially if micro stepping.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 1.355 seconds