Error message during operation with a 7i96s

More
07 Feb 2023 04:25 #263893 by rodw

installing bookworm now...  should be good in 2281 packages...   /o\  hahahaha

If still a problem, you could try the 6.1 kernel  and it headers I built as a Deb. Some people have found it works for them but its not the complete answer.
drive.google.com/drive/folders/10uwGg5Rv...gODk16na?usp=sharing
The following user(s) said Thank You: CADdy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2023 12:54 #263923 by CADdy
As you can read here, the 6.1 PREEMPT kernel has solved my problems. Since Rods help LinuxCNC 2.9 runs perfectly and without errors under Debian 11 Bullseye.

forum.linuxcnc.org/27-driver-boards/4809...i96s?start=10#263460
forum.linuxcnc.org/27-driver-boards/4809...i96s?start=20#263601

Peter
The following user(s) said Thank You: rodw

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2023 19:50 - 07 Feb 2023 19:51 #263966 by Lcvette
ok an update,i installed bookworm and rods 6.1 kernel and retested things, results below on the ping time and latency test was run with 10 glx gears, ping test running, and a 1080 hd youtube video playing over wifi... latency used to be much better on the older buster 10 install, latency was around 8k.  network is setup static with irq coalesce rx 0 line and i ran the line from tommylights network setup.  the ping time is not as good as it was on debian 11 which i posted a few messages back in this thread.  i have since rerun the ping test and that first ping result has been inline with the rest of the ping results and not giving that high number, not sure why it has changed though, thoughts?  

i am about to do a machine test and see if i get the error message but wanted to post this up to see if anyone had input on how to improve things.

Thanks All!

Chris

 

 
Attachments:
Last edit: 07 Feb 2023 19:51 by Lcvette.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2023 20:30 #263968 by rodw
Odd that ping times got worse with the 6.1 kernel.
Was the ping times with your latency test running or without?
It would be interesting to see ping times without latency test running
Did you test on the default Bookworm 6.0 kernel?
It will be interesting to see if it errors. The ping results are very consistent. Let us know how the hardware goes.
There is a fairly recent thread here called LATENCY TEST which works through latency options on a 2 core PC.
Disabling apparmor in grub was one thing he did (As well as isolcpus)
BUt really the latency is half what I used to see on working machines  with a 7i76e for years.                                                                                                                            
Other than that all I can suggest is to test with the default Bookworm kernel. You should be able to reboot into it from the grub menu.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2023 20:33 - 07 Feb 2023 20:34 #263969 by PCW
It sort of looks like you don't have rx-usecs set to 0
Did you try by setting it by hand?

(if say, ethtool is missing you would not know unless you run the command by hand)
Last edit: 07 Feb 2023 20:34 by PCW.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2023 20:47 #263971 by Lcvette
@pcw yes, i got the ethtool mossing and installed it and then ran that line with my network name enp0s25 in place of eth0, it took kt, the results above are with that and with the irq coalesce setting from my previous post.

@rodw i will give it a try

On the bright side, no error has popped up yet

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2023 21:03 - 07 Feb 2023 21:05 #263972 by Lcvette
ok well, that is weird, just to make sure i didn't bork something up i checked the network settings again and they were correct, i then reran the ethtool line and now the ping times have dropped to ~.150..

EDIT:  this was with no other changes still on the 6.1 kernel!

 

 

 



 
Attachments:
Last edit: 07 Feb 2023 21:05 by Lcvette.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2023 21:12 - 07 Feb 2023 21:16 #263973 by Lcvette
here is the new latency ping test, it is actually better with some load on it..lol go figure, shortened by 0.025ms :D

ok now to try those settings rodw mentioned.

Chris

 
Attachments:
Last edit: 07 Feb 2023 21:16 by Lcvette.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2023 21:23 #263974 by Lcvette
ok, so after a restart, the ping time reverts back to the bad 0.260ms range.. do i have to run that ethtool line each restart? or is there a way to make it permanent?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2023 21:29 - 07 Feb 2023 21:31 #263975 by PCW
The command in the interfaces file makes it permanent,
but it looks like you have a typo in your interfaces file:

hardware-irq-coalesce-rx-usec 0

Should be

hardware-irq-coalesce-rx-usecs 0
Last edit: 07 Feb 2023 21:31 by PCW.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: PCWjmelson
Time to create page: 0.297 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum