Linuxcnc 2.9.4 and Mesa 7i97T
- Nkbhvid
- Away
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
27 Jan 2026 18:13 #342011
by Nkbhvid
Replied by Nkbhvid on topic Linuxcnc 2.9.4 and Mesa 7i97T
My current version is 3.4.9
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 21198
- Thank you received: 7241
27 Jan 2026 18:21 #342012
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Linuxcnc 2.9.4 and Mesa 7i97T
You do not need mesaflash unless you need to change the firmware.
Use MesaCT to create a config and test the machine.
-
From your posts it is unclear what you are trying to achieve, you mention Mach3 and 4 used for position control on stepper driven machines, but here you are using a Mesa 7i97T that is explicitly for analog servo drives, so what gives?
Use MesaCT to create a config and test the machine.
-
From your posts it is unclear what you are trying to achieve, you mention Mach3 and 4 used for position control on stepper driven machines, but here you are using a Mesa 7i97T that is explicitly for analog servo drives, so what gives?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Nkbhvid
- Away
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
27 Jan 2026 19:51 #342017
by Nkbhvid
Replied by Nkbhvid on topic Linuxcnc 2.9.4 and Mesa 7i97T
But will it make any sense at all to try to configure the setup as long as I get an “unsupported board”
A little about the background for the project.
I have over time -as a side business - made several retrofits of older (woodworking)cnc machines
Normally I change the driveline to new hybrid steppers controlled by a plc with a control sw developed by ourselves (or in a few projects Mach 3&4), but in this project I have a huge 7ton Homag with very powerful Rexroth motors and drives where i have modified the drives to analog control.
Therefore I went for a LinuxCNC and a mesa 7i97T.
I accept there is a learning curve but it has been far more complex than expected.
I’m surprised about how many YouTubes are found about “LinuxCNC as easy as Mach3” a statement I have hard to believe unless you have 20 years of Linux behind you
A little about the background for the project.
I have over time -as a side business - made several retrofits of older (woodworking)cnc machines
Normally I change the driveline to new hybrid steppers controlled by a plc with a control sw developed by ourselves (or in a few projects Mach 3&4), but in this project I have a huge 7ton Homag with very powerful Rexroth motors and drives where i have modified the drives to analog control.
Therefore I went for a LinuxCNC and a mesa 7i97T.
I accept there is a learning curve but it has been far more complex than expected.
I’m surprised about how many YouTubes are found about “LinuxCNC as easy as Mach3” a statement I have hard to believe unless you have 20 years of Linux behind you
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- unknown
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 875
- Thank you received: 309
27 Jan 2026 21:19 #342023
by unknown
Replied by unknown on topic Linuxcnc 2.9.4 and Mesa 7i97T
You don't need "20 years of Linux behind you", get rid of that way of thinking. All you need to be able to do is follow instructions, minding syntax and not taking shortcuts, and be able to relay any error messages without leaving anything out. It is also to follow any links in replies, it saves those that reply having to repeat any info.
Oh and mesa wouldn't sell you a product that is deemed to work with Linuxcnc that doesn't .
Did you look at the download PCW attached, I think it was a simple config to get you going.
Upgrading mesaflash from the GitHub page may help with your issue .
Oh and mesa wouldn't sell you a product that is deemed to work with Linuxcnc that doesn't .
Did you look at the download PCW attached, I think it was a simple config to get you going.
Upgrading mesaflash from the GitHub page may help with your issue .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.217 seconds