Advanced Search

This is correct.

hallo servus und grias di!

Schöne grüße aus der AIRPOWER 2024 Region, es geht laut her und es gibt neu Entwicklungen.

Nachdem der MiniPc den Elektronischen Himmel Erreicht hat Musste ein neuer her,

MINIS Forum, Läuft und ich habe noch eine Neue Originalverpackte 7i76E bekommen.
Da ich nur die dinge im Hintergrund erledige und alles einstelle und besorge, ist hier meine frage

Braucht die 7i76E bei der Netzwerk Einstellung ein Gateway?

Ich habe dem PC nun 192.168.1.20 > 255.255.255.0 und als Gateway die Karten IP die Standard ja 192.168.1.121 sein soll

nicht dass ich dem Kollegen der in der Zwischenzeit die Mesa 50 km weit weg anschließt und mit Computern so gar nichts am Hut hat einen Rechner gebe der dann nicht verbindet

danke dir im voraus und schöne grüße aus der Steiermark

Have a look at the 'message' component:
linuxcnc.org/docs/stable/html/man/man9/message.9.html

Hello.
Please tell me how to implement the output of messages in the LCNC when a signal is sent to a certain pin HAL.
I need to output messages about device and signal malfunctions when the PIN is set to TRUE. For example, I send a signal to the PIN DIN0 and the message "fan on" is displayed, I send a signal to the PIN DIN1 and the message "Pump on" is displayed.
I would like to see these messages in the standard place for outputting LCNC error messages.
Thank you for your attention and help.

It might help www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-7...a686274dfb3187ad.pdf this paper were writen by NIST(Same institute developed EMC) its use EMC(Linuxcnc's was once EMC)

Hi
Oliver has made some .deb packages, presumably, to setup the reqiured tool chains and packages. Any instructions on usage for us dummies and does the package take away some of the steps defined above?

that kind of system solves the surface area contact so you get the most out of a belt, but it does not look to be a reduction from what i could tell. The idea i have could be configured to work the same way though.

when you get into the servo side of things the encoders are a lot better than what you find on these cheap closed loop steppers and the reduction is less of a big deal as long as the motor can do it[s job.

for what i built i have far more potential speed than space to ramp up to my top end speed so a 3 to 1 reduction would land me in the 4,000 micro step range with a .0002 resolution. one other thing would be the extra torque on the X axis which is powered by a single motor. the tandem axis has a lot more grunt with 2 motors.

I would think it would be much more editing work  to take a sim
config and convert it to a hardware config than adding new joints/axis
to a hardware configuration.

adding joints/axis would mainly consist of copy/pasting/renumbering
axis/joint  sections of the hal and ini files. You could use a 6 axis sim config
as a model for the kinematics related settings.