Back or front tool
- john11668
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 199
- Thank you received: 10
02 Oct 2021 09:34 #222001
by john11668
Replied by john11668 on topic Back or front tool
Machine sets itself up in back tool mode as that is called up in ini file .
For RH thread I could use threading tool reversed in back tool and reverse the spindle but it is then prone to saddle lift,
Hence this question. Will maybe get a chance to try G10 and R180 over the weekend . Sounds like we are in for grotty weather.
For RH thread I could use threading tool reversed in back tool and reverse the spindle but it is then prone to saddle lift,
Hence this question. Will maybe get a chance to try G10 and R180 over the weekend . Sounds like we are in for grotty weather.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- john11668
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 199
- Thank you received: 10
02 Oct 2021 17:11 #222034
by john11668
Replied by john11668 on topic Back or front tool
Right so called up G10 L2 P06 R180 and it tells me " invalid parameters in linear command"
And "linear move on line 13 would exceed Y's positive limit " And I dont have a Y axis ???????
Line 13 calls up G0 X10 Z10 both within limits.
Help please ??
And "linear move on line 13 would exceed Y's positive limit " And I dont have a Y axis ???????
Line 13 calls up G0 X10 Z10 both within limits.
Help please ??
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- newbynobi
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 2075
- Thank you received: 406
05 Oct 2021 05:22 #222247
by newbynobi
Replied by newbynobi on topic Back or front tool
just a curious question.
Did you try to enter a negative pitch while in back tool lathe mode?
By the way, this is not a gmoccapy behavior, it seems to be a trajectory planer issue.
Norbert
Did you try to enter a negative pitch while in back tool lathe mode?
By the way, this is not a gmoccapy behavior, it seems to be a trajectory planer issue.
Norbert
The following user(s) said Thank You: anfänger
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- john11668
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 199
- Thank you received: 10
07 Oct 2021 10:08 #222438
by john11668
Replied by john11668 on topic Back or front tool
Hi Norbert
I did not try a negative pitch .
I thought that would just alter the z motion and I can do that by specifying a negative start and and cutting toward z positive ..
Will give it a try though and report back.
Will also try setting a negative thread depth and if that does not work maybe a negative regression. Must look at the code for internal threads canned cycle to see if any clues there.
I did not try a negative pitch .
I thought that would just alter the z motion and I can do that by specifying a negative start and and cutting toward z positive ..
Will give it a try though and report back.
Will also try setting a negative thread depth and if that does not work maybe a negative regression. Must look at the code for internal threads canned cycle to see if any clues there.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aciera
- Away
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 3942
- Thank you received: 1704
07 Oct 2021 15:09 #222462
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic Back or front tool
As a last resort you could also setup two switchable kinematics.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 23558
- Thank you received: 4858
07 Oct 2021 20:54 #222487
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Back or front tool
Diameter stuff shouldn't care, as smaller-X = smaller-dia regardless of front or back tool.Will also try setting a negative thread depth and if that does not work maybe a negative regression. Must look at the code for internal threads canned cycle to see if any clues there.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- john11668
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 199
- Thank you received: 10
10 Oct 2021 17:28 #222776
by john11668
Replied by john11668 on topic Back or front tool
There is a difference though
To reduce diameter with back tool x minus requires the saddle to move downwards where as this has to be reversed for front tool.
To reduce diameter with back tool x minus requires the saddle to move downwards where as this has to be reversed for front tool.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 23558
- Thank you received: 4858
12 Oct 2021 22:32 #222980
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Back or front tool
That's a config thing if there is only one toolpost. If there are both front and back toolposts, then, yes, it's complicated.There is a difference though
To reduce diameter with back tool x minus requires the saddle to move downwards where as this has to be reversed for front tool.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- john11668
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 199
- Thank you received: 10
12 Oct 2021 23:14 #222986
by john11668
Replied by john11668 on topic Back or front tool
Compicated ? or impossible ?
If complicated then a few pointers might be nice
If complicated then a few pointers might be nice
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 23558
- Thank you received: 4858
14 Oct 2021 00:03 #223053
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Back or front tool
Do you actually have both front and back toolposts?
One workaround is to program one toolpost in negative X. it's a bit of a kludge.
One workaround is to program one toolpost in negative X. it's a bit of a kludge.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: newbynobi, HansU
Time to create page: 0.093 seconds